Showing : 41-50 of 104 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque whether issued in the personal capacity or as proprietor of the business concern - Production of account books - Account books need not to be produced when neither any question is asked during cross examination nor such documents were sought to be produced...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint by sole proprietor - In cause title it is mentioned that complaint is filed by "M" representing M/s Traders "N" Traders, a proprietary concern as its proprietor - Held, no further evidence is needed on behalf of appellant-complainant - Further no reply notice has..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by firm - Prosecution of partner - Cheque issued by accused No.1 from the account maintained by him as a proprietor of firm - Present petitioner has not signed the cheque - Held, petitioner cannot be held liable for prosecution - Application is required to be allowed..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Proprietorship firm - Complaint is maintainable only when proprietor of the firm proves his nexus or connection with the firm as a proprietor - Mere statement in affidavit in this regard is not sufficient - Proprietor has to produce documentary evidence to connect himself..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Proprietorship firm - Complaint is maintainable in the name of `payee' a proprietary concern itself or in the name of the proprietor of the concern...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Cognizance - Cheque not signed by petitioner - Signatory of cheque not claiming that his signatures have been forged - Signatory admitting his signatures on cheque and that cheque was given by the firm of which he is the proprietor - Vicarious liability of petitioner not..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(1)(g), 4, 13-- Shamlat land - Jurisdiction of civil court - Plaintiff filed suit for declaration claiming ownership of suit land as Proprietor of Jumla Mustarka Malkan Arazi Hasab Rasad Rakba Khewat of village - Defendant Gram Panchayat claimed land as Shamlat deh - Determination of question of title involved -..........
CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Superior quality wood given for preparing reception and medicine counter by appellant to respondents who used inferior quality wood - Specifically stated in the complaint that OPs are working in Forest and Electricity Department yet Furniture shop run by them - As the work was..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Dishonour of cheque - Additional accused - Name of proprietor of firm not known - Complaint filed against son of proprietor - Proprietor sought to be arrayed as accused - Complaint against respondent No. 2 can be said to have filed on the date of which application under Section 319 was filed - On..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Dishonour of cheque - Additional accused - Name of proprietor of firm not known - Complaint filed against son of proprietor - Proprietor sought to be arrayed as accused - Even if initially complainant was not aware about the real proprietor, he could move the application under Section 319 of the..........

Showing : 41-50 of 104 Results