Showing : 61-70 of 116 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Plaint - Amendment - Amendment of memo of parties - Sole proprietorship firm - Suit filed in the name of sole proprietorship firm - Suit can only be filed by the sole proprietor by disclosing that he is carrying on business under the name and style of the sole proprietary firm - Trial Court..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Telephone shifting-- Partnership firm - Power of Attorney - Locus standi - Once partnership stood dissolved this power of attorney has no validity - As per law the power of attorney holder could not have filed a complaint in his own name - It had to be filed in the name of persons who have given the power of attorney..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42-- Jumla Mustarka Malkhan Land in possession of petitioner as Proprietor/co-sharer - Land in petitioner's possession allotted to original respondents to make good the shortfall of land allotted to original respondent during consolidation - Order of allotment set aside - Held, petitioner and other..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Proprietorship concern - Complaint u/s.138 of the Act - Complaint can by filed (i) by the proprietor of the proprietary concern, describing himself as the sole proprietor of the `payee'; (ii) The proprietary concern, describing itself as a sole proprietary concern,..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Proprietorship concern - Complaint u/s 138 of the Act - Complaint can be filing by describing viz. (1) ABC, sole proprietor of M/s XYZ or (2) M/s XYZ, a sole proprietary concern represented by its proprietor ABC or (3) ABC, sole proprietor of M/s XYZ represented by his..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Proprietorship concern - Power of Attorney holder - Complaint filed by proprietorship firm through power of attorney holder - Complaint signed by power of attorney holder and not by proprietor - Held, complaint is duly filed by the payee...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 21, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477A, 101, 34, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(1)(c)(d), 13(1)(c)(d), 13(2)-- Quashing of charges on the ground of inordinate delay in recording of FIR and filing of charge sheet - FIR recorded in year 1987 for the offences allegedly committed in the year 1981 - Charge sheet submitted in 1991 - Trial did not commence till 1999 - Delay not attributable to appellant -..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity connection-- Industrial connection - Release of from Rural Feeder to Urban Feeder - Not the case of the complainant that it had deposited the amount in terms of the instructions contained in clause 4 of the sale circular dated 27.9.2005 - The complainant had not fulfilled the said conditions of the Sale..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued in favour of proprietorship firm - Complaint filed by proprietor of firm - Accused denied that complainant was proprietor of the said concern - No evidence adduced that complainant was the proprietor of the firm in whose favour the cheque was issued - Held,..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of Cheque - Proprietorship firm - Notice sent to partner in his individual capacity without mentioning him as proprietor of the firm - Held, a valid notice - Proprietorship firm is not a legal entity - It is only the proprietor of the firm who is a legal entity...........

Showing : 61-70 of 116 Results