Showing : 91-100 of 105 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Plaint - Amendment - Proprietorship firm - Name of proprietor `S' sought to be substituted with the name of `R' - Amendment of all types should ordinarily be allowed as it would minimise the litigation - Order of trial Court allowing amendment, upheld...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Sole proprietorship firm - Proprietor was the complainant company - Held, complaint can be filed by any person connected with company may be its Director or Manager or any other person so authorised...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Sole proprietorship concern - Sole proprietor happened to be a company - Complaint can be filed by any person connected with the company, may be its director or manager or any other person, so authorised by the company, who can represent the company in legal proceedings...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Proprietorship concern - Complaint can either be filed by proprietorship firm through its proprietor or by proprietor in his individual capacity...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Proprietary concern - Complainant can be either the proprietor or any other person who is authorised specifically in regard thereto...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1-- Permission to sue as an indigent person - Where applicant is sole proprietor of firm and carries on business of his firm by availing credit facilities from bank, all assets of his firm on which lending bank does not hold lien, must be disclosed - Disclosure of only a few personal effects of..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 21(1)-- Proviso - Suit filed against respondent No.1 under bona fide belief that he is proprietor and owner of the shop - On becoming aware about name of real owner and proprietor who was none but brother of Respondent No.1 applied for impleading respondents Nos.2 & 3 - Held, plaintiff is entitled to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 77(3)(n)-- Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, Section 14 - A(ii) - Tenant's liability to pay rent - Right of tenant on Tenants Permissible Area and vesting of land in State Government - Only if allotment to tenant has been made - Land would vest in the State only if land is declared surplus - Tenant would..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Sole proprietorship concern - Complaint filed against firm instead of proprietor - Sole proprietorship concern is not a judicial person to come under Criminal Prosecution - Receipt of notice by any other person may not be acceptable and valid acknowledgment of notice - Complaint is liable to be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Section 8A-- Chandigarh Lease - Hold of Sites and Building Rules 12 and 20 - Resumption of Booth for violating terms and conditions of allotment (non - payment of instalments and assigning/sub - letting) - Possession of allottees or any one claiming through them becomes unauthorised - Proceedings held under..........

Showing : 91-100 of 105 Results