Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Section 8A -- Misuser of site - Forfeiture of 10 % of price of plot - Violation with regard to change of user not within control of allottee - As and when allottee came to know about misuser filed ejectment petition against tenant as well as sub - tenant on the ground of change of user - Shows sincerity on the part..........
Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Section 8A -- Resumption of site - On ground of change of user - Violation in the premises with regard to change of user not within the control of the petitioner - When the petitioner came to know of running of guest house in the premises in dispute action taken by him for the ejectment of the tenant - Petitioner..........
Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Section 8A -- Site allotment - Violation of conditions - Violation in the premises with regard to change of user was not within the control of the petitioner hence he cannot be held liable - The amount of recovery for violation of the condition of allotment of site liable to be recovered from the sub-tenant...........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13 -- Unfit and unsafe - Petitioner led evidence regarding unfit condition of the portion in possession of tenant alone - In absence of evidence that entire building is in dilapidated condition, tenant cannot be ordered to be evicted...........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(ii)(b) -- Change of user - Premises if let out without any specific purpose of business then there is no restriction in the kind of the activity which may be carried out by the tenant...........
Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, Section 36, 42, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 6 -- After land has been finally acquired - Land acquisition proceedings cannot be challenged by land owner - Once land finally acquired, compensation paid and possession taken over - Would vest with Government, free from all encumbrances - Land owner whose land acquired for execution..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Membership of Punjab Cricket Association - Refund - Compensation - Deposit of Rs. 10,000 by appellant - complainant for becoming permanent member of the PCA - Requirement of first becoming Associate member of the PCA - Complainant had become an Associate Member against payment of Rs. 11,000/-, i.e. Rs. 10,000/-..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d),2(1),(r) -- Medical education - BAMS Course - Admission - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Misrepresentation on behalf of the OPs that college was approved by the Government of Punjab and CCIM - Complainants admitted for consideration - College of the OPs neither affiliated and recognised by University or the CCIM for..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 31, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 35 -- Punjab Land Record Manual, Para 3.79 - Roznamcha Patwari, entry in - Made by official concerned in the course of performance of his official duties - Admissible under Section 35 Evidence Act - - Cannot be said that entry made in Roznamcha of Patwari not genuine - Evidence Act, Section 35...........
Punjab Financial Rules -- Recovery of loss - The provision of Rule 2.33 of the PF Rules cannot be equated to the provisions relating to imposition of penalty under the service rules - It is a provision to recover losses suffered by it as a result of fraud or negligence of the employees primarily founded on a finding of negligence - Serving a show cause notice would be..........
