LawMirror.com

Results of punjab

Showing : 3331-3340 of 7532 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Section 8A -- Misuser of site - Forfeiture of 10 % of price of plot - Violation with regard to change of user not within control of allottee - As and when allottee came to know about misuser filed ejectment petition against tenant as well as sub - tenant on the ground of change of user - Shows sincerity on the part..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Section 8A -- Resumption of site - On ground of change of user - Violation in the premises with regard to change of user not within the control of the petitioner - When the petitioner came to know of running of guest house in the premises in dispute action taken by him for the ejectment of the tenant - Petitioner..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Section 8A -- Site allotment - Violation of conditions - Violation in the premises with regard to change of user was not within the control of the petitioner hence he cannot be held liable - The amount of recovery for violation of the condition of allotment of site liable to be recovered from the sub-tenant...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13 -- Unfit and unsafe - Petitioner led evidence regarding unfit condition of the portion in possession of tenant alone - In absence of evidence that entire building is in dilapidated condition, tenant cannot be ordered to be evicted...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(ii)(b) -- Change of user - Premises if let out without any specific purpose of business then there is no restriction in the kind of the activity which may be carried out by the tenant...........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, Section 36, 42, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 6 -- After land has been finally acquired - Land acquisition proceedings cannot be challenged by land owner - Once land finally acquired, compensation paid and possession taken over - Would vest with Government, free from all encumbrances - Land owner whose land acquired for execution..........

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Membership of Punjab Cricket Association - Refund - Compensation - Deposit of Rs. 10,000 by appellant - complainant for becoming permanent member of the PCA - Requirement of first becoming Associate member of the PCA - Complainant had become an Associate Member against payment of Rs. 11,000/-, i.e. Rs. 10,000/-..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d),2(1),(r) -- Medical education - BAMS Course - Admission - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Misrepresentation on behalf of the OPs that college was approved by the Government of Punjab and CCIM - Complainants admitted for consideration - College of the OPs neither affiliated and recognised by University or the CCIM for..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 31, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 35 -- Punjab Land Record Manual, Para 3.79 - Roznamcha Patwari, entry in - Made by official concerned in the course of performance of his official duties - Admissible under Section 35 Evidence Act - - Cannot be said that entry made in Roznamcha of Patwari not genuine - Evidence Act, Section 35...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Punjab Financial Rules -- Recovery of loss - The provision of Rule 2.33 of the PF Rules cannot be equated to the provisions relating to imposition of penalty under the service rules - It is a provision to recover losses suffered by it as a result of fraud or negligence of the employees primarily founded on a finding of negligence - Serving a show cause notice would be..........

Showing : 3331-3340 of 7532 Results