Showing : 1-10 of 81 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 3(i)-- Merger of Gram Sabha - Contention of petitioner that since population of Gram Panchayat Ilahi Baksh Bodla is less than 300, therefore, it has to be merged with Gram Panchayat Guddar Panj Grain - Held, S.3(1) of the Act categorically provides that Gram Sabha constituted prior to commencement of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 3(i)-- Merger of Gram Sabha - Permissibility - Held, merger should be taken as a last resort even if Gram Panchayat is not in a position to administer its affair because in that circumstance, Government may appoint an administrator...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, Punjab Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Section 4(2), 5, 44, 51, 71, 77-- Embezzlement to the tune of 30 lakhs on the pretext of sending son of complainant to America for permanent job - Jurisdiction of Panchayat to try the offence - Held, (i) There is no bar for investigating any offence by the police including the offences mentioned in the Schedule II of the Punjab..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, Punjab Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Section 4(2), 5, 44, 51, 71, 77-- Embezzlement to the tune of 30 lakhs on the pretext of sending son of complainant to America for permanent job - Jurisdiction of Panchayat to try the offence - Offence of serious nature as appellant has duped Rs.30 lakhs from the complainant, offence should be tried by regular criminal court only..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 20(1)(d)-- Removal of Panch or Sarpanch - Held, no Sarpanch or Panch can be removed solely on allegation that he absented himself/herself from meeting of Gram Panchayat unless it is duly proved that Sarpanch or Panch absented for more than two consecutive months as envisaged u/s 20(1)(d)...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Section 20(5)- - Suspension of Panch - Delayed enquiry - Appellant (Panch) under suspension for last more than one year and respondents have not concluded enquiry - Held, long suspension of an elected representative is neither in interest of Panchayati Raj democracy nor justified in facts and circumstances of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 3, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226-- Writ petition - Maintainability of - Held, inclusion or exclusion of an area within municipal limits or constitution of a gram panchayat would not per se come within ambit of a writ Court though statutory procedure required to be followed by competent authority for such determination falls within..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 20, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226-- Suspension of Panch - Illegal possession - Validity - Held, if any Panch of Gram panchayat is in illegal possession of gram Panchayat land of a different village even then he would become liable for action - But in present case, allegation is not substantiated against petitioner because it is..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 200, 201-- Appointment of administrator - Departmental guidelines - Violation of - Held, where administrator is appointed in violation of departmental guidelines and rules, action will be initiated against him u/R.8 for imposing major penalty upon him - Officers entrusted with responsibility to appoint..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 20-- Removal of Panches - Validity - Petitioners removed from post of Panch on ground that they did not attend meetings on various dates and that in meetings of Gram Panchayat they did not agree with Sarpanch for development works - Held, Panch has a right to express his view point independently in..........

Showing : 1-10 of 81 Results