Showing : 121-130 of 249 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7-- Ejectment from Shamlat Deh - Petitioner claiming that he is owner of the land in dispute being right holder/share holder and in possession of Jumla Malkhan land owned by him in accordance with the respective shares in the holdings - However, Gram Panchayat claimed that the land in dispute is..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 5, 15(2)(f)-- Shamlat Deh - Auction - Previous approval of State Govt. not obtained - Sale is invalid - Purchaser cannot claim title of land even if he deposited some amount towards auction and had taken possession...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(5)-- Shamlat Deh - Revenue entries that land is Banjar Qadeem Charand - Means land is used for common purposes for the grazing of cattle - In view of S.2(g)(5) land is Shamlat Deh which vests in the Gram Panchayat...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g), East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 18-- Shamlat Deh - Land recorded as `Jumla Malkan Wa Digar Haqdaran Arazi Hasab Rasad', `Jumla Malkan' or `Mushtarka Malkan' - It is ownership of the proprietors of the village abadi - It vests in the Gram Panchayat only if during consolidation proceedings, it was reserved for common purposes in terms..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11-- Panchayat land - Eviction petition dismissed for non prosecution - Nothing decided in the previous litigation which would operate as res judicata between the parties - Held, subsequent petition is not barred...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7(1)-- Eviction sought on ground that petitioner is in wrongful or unauthorised possession of Shamlat land vesting in Gram Panchayat - Held, factum of wrongful or unauthorised occupation is to be determined by Asstt. Collector Grade I in proceedings initiated under S.7 of the Act and by no other..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7(2)-- Eviction of petitioners sought on the ground that they are in wrongful or unauthorised possession of Shamlat Land vesting in Gram Panchayat - Petitioners contended that the land was given on lease to their predecessors by Govt. way back in year 1955 - Deputy Commissioner, after enquiry gave..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 13A-- (As amended by Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Haryana Amendment Act, 1980 - Civil suit for declaration that land belongs to plaintiff and defendants namely Faridabad Complex Administration has no right in respect of the suit land - Maintainability of civil suit - Held, Punjab Village..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7, 11-- Unauthorized possession of shamlat land - Sarpanch not initiating any action to get the unauthorized occupant evicted - Held, any resident of village can file application for eviction of unauthorized occupant - Every resident of village has interest in common land...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(6), East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 48-- Land contributed by proprietors on pro-rata cut on their holdings imposed during consolidation proceedings which had not been earmarked for any common purpose in the consolidation scheme prepared u/s 14 read with Rules 5 and 7 and/or entered in the column of ownership as Jumla Mustarka Malkans Wa..........

Showing : 121-130 of 249 Results