Showing : 251-260 of 414 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 7-- before amendment by Punjab Act 19 of 1976-Did not debar the Assistant Collector to determine the question whether the land in dispute falls within the definition of Shamlat Deh or not and whether it vests in Gram Panchayat or not-Statute then prevalent did not oust jurisdiction of Civil Court to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 7-- Conspectus of law as emerged from Kesho Narain's case 1964 PLJ 22, Piare Lal's case 1977 PLJ 263, Mangal's case 1977 PLJ 249 and Dharam Singh's case 1975 PLJ 68-Authorities under the Act had jurisdiction to decide the relevant question before ejectment-Civil Court's jurisdiction to challenge the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 7-- as amended and Sections 11, 12 and 13 as added by Punjab Act 19 of 1976- Jurisdiction conferred on the Authority under the Act to deter mine the question of title between Gram Panchayat and occupants- Legislature removed the jurisdiction of ordinary Civil Court to determine the lis with respect to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules-- Commissioner does not have the power to give any direction to Collector to charge price of land under Rule 4 - Rule 4 does not authorise any other body except the Panchayat to allow a person to retain possession of a site by payment of price - Construction if made before coming into force of the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1949-- Bachat land, redistribution of amongst proprietors of the village hasab rasad raqba khewat-Land taken from each proprietor by imposing a pro-rata cut on his holding with a view to meet common purpose of the village-Land left over after providing common purpose-Known as Bachat land-Does not vest in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 4, 2(g)-- East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, Sections 18, 23-A and 2(bb)-Bachat land mutated in the name of Gram Panchayat and later on incorporated in Jamabandi-Not Shamlat Deh-Does not vest Bachat land in Gram Panchayat-Bachat land is ownership of proprietors of the..........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(iia), 3- - Allotments/transfers of Shamlat Deh made before cut off date i.e. July 9, 1985 (date of pronouncement of orders by Supreme Court in Gram Panchayat Jamalpur's case 1985 PLJ 463) - Saved and regularised - All rights, title and interest of Panchayats in evacuees share in Shamlat Deh as from..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 4-- Vesting of land in Notified Area Committee - Not necessary that whole of Sabha area must have been included in it - In case of non-inclusion of whole area jurisdiction of committee shall got reduced and confined to part included...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 16-- Vesting of land in Gram Panchayat under Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1953 - Mutation sanctioned in name of Notified Area Committee - Repeal of Gram Panchayat Act, 1953 - Held, original owners of land cannot claim reversion of lands to them...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1988
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7-- Proviso - Scope of - Only when proved prima facie that there is a question of title that Assistant Collector required to decide the same under Section 13A - Assistant Collector has to be satisfied that title prima facie proved and question required o be adjudicated - Not in each and every case..........

Showing : 251-260 of 414 Results