Showing : 231-240 of 285 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42-- Additional Director Consolidation ordered change of mutation entries in revenue record and distribution of land amongst right - holders - Land recorded in Jamabandi as 'Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Raqba Khewat' prior to consolidation proceedings as also after consolidation - Question of ownership can..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42-- Additional Director Consolidation has no authority to go into the question whether the land in dispute is Shamlat Deh or not-Jamabandi entry prior to consolidation reads 'Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Khewat' and in cultivation column entry is 'Maqbooza Malkan'-Question whether land is Shamlat Deh or..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42-- Khewatdars (proprietors) filed petition under Section 42 against re-partition and prayed for partition of land owned by proprietary body but wrongly shown as Shamilat Deh- Land shown in revenue records as Shamilat Patti Hasab Pamana Hakiat, mutated in favour of Gram Panchayat in 1955 and..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 13, 11-- Suit in Civil Court for declaration and permanent injunction claiming to be Khewatdars and owners in possession of disputed land shown as Jumla Mushtarka Malkan restraining Gram Panchayat from interfering in peaceful possession-Gram Panchayat contested it averring that disputed land is Shamilat..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 7-- Conspectus of law as emerged from Kesho Narain's case 1964 PLJ 22, Piare Lal's case 1977 PLJ 263, Mangal's case 1977 PLJ 249 and Dharam Singh's case 1975 PLJ 68-Authorities under the Act had jurisdiction to decide the relevant question before ejectment-Civil Court's jurisdiction to challenge the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 7-- as amended and Sections 11, 12 and 13 as added by Punjab Act 19 of 1976- Jurisdiction conferred on the Authority under the Act to deter mine the question of title between Gram Panchayat and occupants- Legislature removed the jurisdiction of ordinary Civil Court to determine the lis with respect to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 7-- before amendment by Punjab Act 19 of 1976-Did not debar the Assistant Collector to determine the question whether the land in dispute falls within the definition of Shamlat Deh or not and whether it vests in Gram Panchayat or not-Statute then prevalent did not oust jurisdiction of Civil Court to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules-- Commissioner does not have the power to give any direction to Collector to charge price of land under Rule 4 - Rule 4 does not authorise any other body except the Panchayat to allow a person to retain possession of a site by payment of price - Construction if made before coming into force of the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1949-- Bachat land, redistribution of amongst proprietors of the village hasab rasad raqba khewat-Land taken from each proprietor by imposing a pro-rata cut on his holding with a view to meet common purpose of the village-Land left over after providing common purpose-Known as Bachat land-Does not vest in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 4, 2(g)-- East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, Sections 18, 23-A and 2(bb)-Bachat land mutated in the name of Gram Panchayat and later on incorporated in Jamabandi-Not Shamlat Deh-Does not vest Bachat land in Gram Panchayat-Bachat land is ownership of proprietors of the..........

Showing : 231-240 of 285 Results