Showing : 11-20 of 21 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376-- Kidnapping and rape - Age of prosecutrix - School leaving certificate showed age of prosecutrix 14 years at the time of incident - Teacher of Govt. school where prosecutrix studies examined as prosecution witness - Report of Radiologist who conducted ossification test opined age to be between..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 363, 366A-- Abduction and rape of minor girl - Love affair between accused and prosecutrix - Doctor found sex characters of prosecutrix well developed - Prosecutrix did not ever resist her being repeatedly deflowered by accused - - Prosecutrix not examined by Dental Surgeon or Radiologist despite she being..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Medical negligence-- Compensation - Ultrasound examination - Pregnant lady - Examination done in December, 1995, March, 1996 and June, 1996 - Radiologist specifically confirmed that fetal organs were visualized and were no obvious anomalies as revealed by report - Girl child born which was suffering from a deformity..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Medical negligence-- Ultra sonography report - Wrong diagnosis - The report of the petitioner about the abscess left lobe is contradicted by another radiologist within 24 hours in another hospital - It speaks volumes about the competence of the petitioner - The negligence writ large on the face of it on the part of..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CIRCUIT BENCH AT PUNE
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Medical negligence-- MRI report - MRI taken by a senior resident doctor - Such report endorsed by the consulting doctor - Mistake in noticing a tumor on the basis of MRI film - The consulting radiologist who signs the report is responsible for misreading or not reading/looking at the MRI film correctly - In such a..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Medical negligence-- Suit for damages on account of death of plaintiff's wife - Angiography test not conducted which was the surest method to diagnose the disease of deceased - Reasons for not conducting this test was non availability of radiologist - On the other hand a test which was not needed conducted thrice -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Medical opinion-- Doctor opined injury dangerous of life on the basis of x-ray report - Radiologist who x-rayed the injuries not examined - Opinion of doctor is of no avail...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Section 12-- Bail - Juvenile offender - Proof of age of juvenile - Ossification test - Offence u/s 304-B IPC - On the date of occurrence age of accused was 17 years 2 months - Doctor opined that radiological bone age of the petitioner is to be above 21 years - Test conducted by Radiologist is not accurate test..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Age - Determination - Ossification test - Not a surer test for determining the age as margin of error of age as determined by the radiologist, could be two years on either side...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Part II-- Summoning of Radiologist for giving evidence and for submitting X-ray reports by exercise of power u/s 311 Part II - It is not prosecution lacuna of not summoning the Radiologist and producing X-rays as the prosecution has summoned the concerned doctor who treated the injured persons and gave the..........

Showing : 11-20 of 21 Results