Showing : 81-90 of 349 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - Where plaintiff closed his evidence and did not reserve his right to lead evidence in rebuttal, he cannot be permitted to lead evidence in rebuttal qua which the onus was on him - However, in exceptional case, where plaintiff is not negligent in leading his evidence in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - When there are several issues and burden of proof some of which lies upon defendant, plaintiff can adduce his entire evidence on all the issues including those onus of proof is upon defendant or having led the evidence in affirmative as regards issues the onus of proof of which..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - Plaintiff has option to lead his entire evidence on all issues and in case he intends to lead rebuttal evidence or answer the evidence that is to be led by defendant as regards the issues the onus of proof is upon defendant, he shall have to reserve his right - Further,..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3, 2-- Rebuttal evidence - Provisions of O.18.R.2 & O.18.R.3 CPC are mutually exclusive and have their independent domains and thus operate in different situations - Both the provisions cannot be read in conjunction but independently and in isolation as regards the right of party beginning to lead..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - Hand writing and finger print expert - Document forming foundation of case and propounded by plaintiff was to be proved by him - However while framing issues, onus was placed on defendant to prove that document was forged and fabricated - When onus of proving issue was on..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - Expert opinion - Defendants have set up a Will which is subject matter of challenge of suit - Onus of proving that Will in question is null and void was upon plaintiff - Once onus is upon plaintiff, he cannot examine expert by way of rebuttal evidence after leading evidence in..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Sought at the stage when case was fixed for rebuttal evidence and arguments - Plea that plaintiff is a unregistered partnership firm - For deciding application for rejection of plaint only averments made in plaint are seen and version of defendant in written statement or the..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - When entire evidence has already been led, mere recasting of an issue does not change the situation and claim of plaintiff to lead rebuttal evidence to this issue when arguments are already in progress after completion of evidence by parties has no merit particularly when there..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 20-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance not proved - Question of presumption and its rebuttal does not arise...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 112, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Claim of paternity - DNA test - At the stage of rebuttal evidence - Where Court finds that there is sufficient prima facie evidence for purpose of conducting DNA test, then there is no bar for trial Court to allow said DNA test at the stage of rebuttal evidence so that a child who claims himself..........

Showing : 81-90 of 349 Results