Showing : 141-150 of 284 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal - Plaintiff cannot be permitted to lead evidence in rebuttal on a issue for which the burden of proof was on him - Trial Court rejected application of plaintiff to lead evidence after close of evidence of plaintiff on the ground that evidence sought to be adduced is not of rebuttal and..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction petition - Amendment sought to introduce statutory requirement of law to plead and prove that 'he is not occupying any other similar accommodation in the same urban area and has also not vacated similar accommodation in the same urban area after the commencement of Act, 1949' - Amendment..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-- Sch 2, Item 3 - Domestic enquiry - Respondent working as Cashier - cum- Clerk in Bank misappropriated money by making fictitious entry - On his malfeasance coming to light, respondent not only admitted his guilt in writing but also deposited amount to make good the amount earlier deflected by him..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 106-- Notice - Sent by registered post at correct address - Once plaintiff led evidence and duly proved the service of legal notice, defendant is bound to lead rebuttal evidence to show that notice was not served although the same was posted to the correct address - Rebuttal evidence not led - Held,..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Additional evidence at appellate stage - Trial Court dismissed complaint as it did not believe the story of complainant of giving loan to accused - Additional evidence sought to be led at appellate stage to summon witnesses from Bank to prove that in fact loan amount involved..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal - Plaintiff closed his evidence without reserving his right to adduce evidence on any of the issues, the burden of which was on the defendant - Defendant did not lead any evidence - Held, when right was not reserved by plaintiff to adduce evidence in rebuttal and when no evidence is..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 20, Rule 12-- Mesne Profits - Grant of - Defendants under perception that defendant No.4 had half share in bus forcibly took away the bus - Specific plea of plaintiff that he was earning Rs.1,000/- per day by plying bus - Plea regarding income from bus has not been specifically denied by defendants - There is..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal - Hand writing expert - Cannot be allowed to be examined in rebuttal evidence when execution of agreement was denied in written statement and onus to prove agreement was on plaintiff...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17-- Admission - Rebuttal in cross-examination - Effect of - Held, admission is the best evidence but when admitted fact itself later on has been denied by defendant in his cross examination, then it was the duty of plaintiff to prove his own case...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Complainant a chitty company - Accused subscriber of complainant - Chitty prized in favour of accused - Chitty amount availed by accused - Both courts below have concurrently found that dishonoured cheque in question was issued by accused towards discharge of liability due to..........

Showing : 141-150 of 284 Results