Showing : 181-190 of 284 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(g), 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 106-- Abduction, rape and murder of prosecutrix - Abduction proved - In view of presumption u/s 106 Evidence Act it was for the accused to prove as to what else had happened to deceased after her abduction by them - No rebuttal to this presumption by accused as accused not disclosed as to what else had..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Affidavit-- When neither affidavit in rebuttal is filed nor averments made in affidavit are controverted then averments made in affidavit must be accepted as true and correct drawing the presumption in favour of the petitioner. (Evidence Act, 1872, S.114(g)...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, Rule 63-- Drug licence - Renewal - Rule 63 says that if application is made within 6 months of its expiry after the payment of additional fees, licence shall continue to be in force until orders are passed on the application - Petitioners case is that immediately after expiry of licence he moved an..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391-- Dishonour of cheque - Repayment alleged - Receipt produced in defence evidence - In rebuttal complainant filed an affidavit that he never issued such receipt and it does not bear his signature and it is forged - Complainant once again cross examined and he once again denied his signature on the..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Good supplied - Cheque issued for amount due as price of such goods - No rebuttal evidence adduced to disprove the claim - Contention that goods had not been supplied patently false - Amount required to be paid as price of articles or goods is a legitimate debt or liability..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - Reservation of right - Last stage for exercising option to reserve the right of rebuttal can be before the other party begins its evidence...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - A party cannot be allowed to lead evidence in rebuttal on an issue, the burden of which is on the said party...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal - Right not reserved - Mere negligence - For such a lapse the other side can be compensated with costs - Procedural law should be construed liberally to achieve ends of justice rather than to scuffle the parties right at the trial stage and prevent them from leading complete evidence in..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Electricity bill-- Energy theft - Report of the ME Lab that the MCB hinges are welded from outside and are not as per design of the Board - The 'perfected' artificial means have been proved by the respondent-Board with the help of report from the ME Lab by the appellant to decrease the reading of the meter by..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3-- Rebuttal evidence - Onus to prove some issues on defendant - Plaintiff while leading his evidence if makes statement on issues the onus of which was on the defendant the same does not mean that plaintiff had infact led or concluded his evidence on those issues - Plaintiff has a right of rebuttal..........

Showing : 181-190 of 284 Results