Showing : 41-50 of 213 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recall of PWs for cross-examination - Statements of I.O was recorded but inadvertency he was not cross-examined with relation to Article-1 which was exhibited by him - Immediately, thereafter, petitioner moved an application u/s 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recalling of witnesses to the extent of Article..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recall of witness for further cross examination - An application u/s 311 Cr.P.C. can be considered even at the fag end of trial and if necessary allowed if Court finds that allowing such application will not render filling up of the lacuna in either the prosecution case or the defence case...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of a witness - A witness not named in the list of witnesses cannot be allowed to be examined as a witness at the fag end of trial - Moreover, recall of a witness is only when a witness is examined - Application for summoning witness rightly rejected...........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recall of a witness - Witness not cross examined on a certain point - This is very vague ground to seek recall of witness...........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recall of a witness - Witness examined and cross examined - Order for recall and examination of witnesses cannot be granted on mere asking...........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of witness for further cross-examination - Defendants sought further cross-examination of PW2 by confronting a `notarized declaration' said to be made by her - However, defendants failed to file such application at the appropriate stage - Even defendants failed to show that application is..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Recall of a witness for re-examination - After cross-examination of witness by adverse party, party who called witness can re-examine witness and such re-examination shall be directed to explanation of matters referred to in cross-examination - If new matter is introduced in re-examination with..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Recall of witness for re-examination - When witness has supported prosecution case in his examination-in-chief and has also been cross-examined at length and he has even denied to specific suggestions put forth by defence counsel that there was no demand or acceptance of bribe money by petitioner..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Recall of witness for re-examination - Merely because in unguarded moment, witness spoke something in cross-examination which did not suit prosecution, Court should not have exercised its discretion to allow prosecution to cross-examine witness...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, 273, 299-- Recall of witnesses examined in absence of accused as he was absconding - Absconding during pendency of trial, accused himself waived his right to cross-examine the witnesses, however, right of accused to cross-examine witness is valuable right - One opportunity granted to accused to cross-examine..........

Showing : 41-50 of 213 Results