Showing : 31-40 of 45 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(2)(vi), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3-- Compromise decree - Lessor alienated absolutely the right, title and interest in suit property in favour of lessee - By virtue of compromise decree right, title and interest was absolutely alienated, and created for the first time in favour of the lessees - Held, compromise decree requires..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3, Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(2)(vi)-- Compromise decree - Registration - Can be summarized as : (1) Compromise decree, if bonafide, in the sense that the compromise is not a device to obviate payment of stamp duty and frustrate the law relating to registration, would not require registration - In a converse situation, it would require..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HlGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(1)(b)-- Consent decree - Registration - Family settlement - Property partitioned - Memorandum of understanding recording past family settlement / partition executed - Consent decree passed - Consent decree only recognised pre-existing rights - No new rights created or existiguished - Decree does not..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17-- Consent decree - No antecedent title or interest in suit land - Interest or title created for the first time on passing of the decree regarding property of value of more than Rs.100/- - Held, decree requires compulsory registration - Without registration decree does not confer any valid title...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(1)(vi)-- Decree passed on the basis of admission in written statement of alleged family settlement - Does not require registration - Court given declaration of pre - existing rights in favour of plaintiffs which were created in their favour by virtue of family settlement which had taken place prior to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17-- Compulsory registration of document - Undertaking in Court by third party in a consent decree to abide by a particular course of action if J.D. fails to satisfy decree - Does not require registration - Declaration or undertaking conceding such liberty of action cannot be construed to fall under..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17-- Partition decree - Registration - Every decree is not required to be drawn up on a stamp paper unless it divides any property in severality amongst co-owners - Pursuant to the said decree if property is sold the said instrument of sale will be required to be stamped and thereafter got registered...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(2)(vi)-- Compromise decree - Reference to oral exchange by delivery of possession of immovable property which had already taken place - No right in immovable property for the first time created by the decree - Decree does not require compulsory registration...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(2)(vi)-- Only by passing of decree rights created in property for the first time - Decree simpliciter on admission creating rights and even if treated to be a decree on compromise - Registration is mandatory - Unregistered decree - Ineffective and incapable of passing any title...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(2)(vi)-- Compromise decree - Case of exchange - Can be only done by a registered deed - Resort to Court decree - Results in violation of law of registration...........

Showing : 31-40 of 45 Results