Showing : 91-100 of 143 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 20(c), Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Jurisdiction - Agreement to supply goods made at Delhi - Goods supplied from plaintiff's godown situated at Delhi - Defendant accepted the terms and conditions printed on the bills/invoices that Court at Delhi shall have jurisdiction - Held, by virtue of S.20(c) CPC Court at..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Suit on the apprehension that defendant is attempting to transfer the property to some other person in breach of agreement - Held, it constitutes a valid cause of action - Suit cannot be thrown out at the threshold U.O.7.R.11 CPC...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Application has to be decided on the basis of averments in the plaint - Pleas taken by defendant in the written statement are irrelevant...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Matter is to be decided only on averments made in plaint - At this stage, pleas taken by defendant in written statement are wholly irrelevant...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(d), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 17-- Rejection of plaint - Respective plaintiffs had knowledge with respect to the transaction in the year 1999 and even in the year 2004, when RTS Appeals were preferred challenging the Mutation Entries in favour of defendants and even with respect to the alleged forgery in the year 2004 when..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(b)-- Rejection of plaint - Under-valuation of partition suit - Determination of - No specific averment in plaint to the effect that plaintiffs have been excluded from possession of property in question - It is specifically pleaded that plaintiffs and defendant are co-owners of suit properties - It is..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(d), Limitation Act, 1963, Article 59-- Rejection of plaint - Limitation - Suit for declaration, partition and cancellation - In paragraphs 13 and 14 of the plaint, it is specifically stated by plaintiffs that the alleged will dated 17.06.2008 and gift deed dated 28.03.2005 came to their knowledge on receipt of a copy of the will..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(d)-- Rejection of plaint - Application for - Counsel for respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs could not refer to any other ground to challenge sale deed except the ground of being Benami transaction - Held, no mixed question of law and fact is required to be adjudicated to decide application of defendant..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Eviction suit - Plaintiff himself has come out with a case that tenancy was for a godown - Defendant moved application U.O.7.R.11 CPC alleging that premises was not a `building', suit could not have been instituted in the Court of Small Causes - Court of Small Causes rejected..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Suit for recovery of dues - Plaint clearly discloses a cause of action and is not barred under law in its entirety - There is a cause of action against private defendant Nos.1 and 2 for recovery of amount - Held, suit in civil court is not barred for recovery of amount by..........

Showing : 91-100 of 143 Results