Showing : 501-510 of 3022 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Ejectment - Co-owners of property - Partition - Held, a tenant inducted by one of the co-owners cannot be defeated in his statutory right of protection under the Act of 1949 by an allotment in partition to other co-sharers of property so long as lease itself was not collusive or in excess of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Eviction petition - Amendment of - Personal necessity - Contention of petitioner/tenant that respondent/landlord had not pleaded necessary ingredients of S.13(3)(a)(i) of the Act and he was allowed to do so only by way of amendment and that too after leading evidence by parties, therefore,..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972, Section 2(e), 5- - Eviction - Unauthorized occupant - Civil Court only protected possession of petitioner till he is proceeded against in accordance with law - Policy dated 01.11.2001 relied upon by petitioner has already been held unconstitutional by High Court in CWP No.2272 of 2003 titled as Dalmer Singh v...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(a)(2)(V)-- Eviction - Ceased to occupy - Premises taken on lease for running Spinning and Weaving Mill - Mill was lying closed prior to filing of eviction petition and entire machinery from factory premises stood removed - Petitioner/tenant was in possession of premises and had also employed certain persons..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e)-- Eviction - Bona fide requirement - Respondent/landlord required premises for office of son who has passed LLB examination and started his practice and wants to operate his office under guidance of his other family members who are advocates - Factum of his becoming advocate and practicing is not..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Rent and Eviction -- Ejectment - Agreement of tenancy between parties provided for an adjudication by arbitral process - Plea that lease period has expired and, therefore, agreement cannot be relied on for reference to arbitration - Held, plea liable to be rejected - Arbitral agreement was to resolve any dispute and..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 25(b)(8)-- Eviction - Revisional jurisdiction - Exercise of - Held, revision u/s.25B(8) of the Act cannot be regarded as first appeal nor can it be as restricted as revisional jurisdiction u/s.115 CPC - High Court would have jurisdiction to interfere if it is of opinion that there has been gross illegality..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e)-- Eviction - Bona fide need - Landlord/respondent has undergone bye-pass surgery and became handicap - He is unable to climb up to second floor of another property where he was working earlier - Held, need of landlord bona fide - Eviction proper - Revision dismissed...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Haryana Public Premises (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972, Section 5, 7, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226- - Unauthorized occupants - Petitioners are in unauthorized possession over land which belongs to State of Haryana - They knew very well that they are in authorized possession but instead of accepting this fact they contested application with tooth and nail alleging that they have rightly raised..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Closing of evidence - Recalling of witness - Suit for possession, arrears of rent and mesne profit - Witness Building Inspector suffered statement that summoned record was not traceable - His evidence closed by Court - Held, it was not fault of petitioner who genuinely summoned that witness -..........

Showing : 501-510 of 3022 Results