Showing : 1081-1090 of 1499 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Chandigarh Lease Hold of Site and Building Rules, 1973-- Allotment of plots - Resumption Order - Dispute regarding charging of interest on instalments and ground rent and non payment thereof and penalty for delayed payment - Reling on M/s Shanti Kunj's case JT 2006(3) SC 1, writ petitions disposed of with directions to make representation before Estate..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bona fide need - Expansion of business - Landlord running Departmental store in ground floor of shop cum office - He wanted first and second floor for expansion of business - Need held to be bona fide...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bona fide need - The need of the landlords has to be examined broadly and reasonably considering their social status and other requirements...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Partnership Act, 1932, S.4 - Bona fide need - Partnership - Need of premises is not of the respondents-landlords, but the need of the firm also cannot be accepted - All the respondents are partners of the firm and as such, the need would not be of the firm, of course, of its partners...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bona fide need - Increase in family members of landlord - Landlord wanted shop for his grandsons - Non examination of grandson does not weaken the case of the landlord...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(a)(i)-- Bona fide need - Establishing business of son - Requirement of any dependent of the landlord can also be considered to be requirement of landlord...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(a)(i)-- Bona fide need - Establishing business of son - Landlord and his son not owning any other non residential premises to establish their business nor they vacated any premises after the commencement of the Act - As such no mala fide can be attributed to the landlord with regard to their requirement..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(4)-- Eviction on ground of personal need - If premises is sold or again rented out to some other person within 12 months after obtaining possession, tenant is entitled to restoration of possession...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide need - Pleading - Failure to plead that landlord is not occupying any other residential building in the urban area concerned and also that he had not vacated any residential building, without sufficient cause - It is not necessary to plead all the ingredients in the ejectment application..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Sub letting - Joint Family - Widow of brother alongwith her children residing with tenant in one room - Not sub letting...........

Showing : 1081-1090 of 1499 Results