Showing : 31-40 of 490 Results

SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 371F(k), Gangtok Rent Control and Eviction Act, 1956, Section 4-- Rent and eviction - Bonafide requirement - Landlord and his wife retired from their government services and they require premises for the purpose of selling computer spare parts and accessories to augment their income to medical education of their daughter and preparation for her future - Even,..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, 243ZA, Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1983, Section 18(1)(g)-- Election disqualification - Execution of warrant of arrest stayed against respondent - Respondent being absconder cannot be treated as candidate disqualified from contesting election - Order of upholding election of respondent as winning candidate is wholly in accordance with law - Appeal..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
H.P.Urban Rent Control Act, 1987,, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9,10-- Rent and eviction - All the co-owners in an eviction petition seeking eviction on the ground of reconstruction of building are necessary party - In case one co-owner is allowed to raise construction without consent of other co-owners by way of judicial order then legal rights of other co-owners..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14(3)(c)-- Eviction order on ground of reconstruction of building - Tenant has right of re-induction in the building reconstructed by landlord on payment of rent to be settled taking into consideration the rent of similar space prevalent in the market...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14(3)(c)-- Eviction - Bonafide requirement of premises for re-construction - Eviction sought for raising construction of first floor as it is not possible to raise construction of first floor on the existing structure - Reconstruction is for making provision for additional accommodation - No prejudice is..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of written statement - At appellate stage - Eviction petition on ground of bona fide necessity for business of son - Amendment of written statement sought that son of landlord started his own business - Fact that son of landlord already started a new business, does not imply that..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14-- Rent and Eviction - Material alterations - Tenant has categorically admitted that he has made additions and alterations without consent of landlady - Nature of construction raised by tenant is permanent and these are not removable - Construction of permanent structures inside premises has..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14-- Eviction - Nature of building - Dominant user of building would serve as a guiding factor to determine the nature of building - If dominant user remains running of trade and business, then even if small portion is used as residence, it would remain no, residential building - Likewise, if dominant..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14-- Eviction - Non-residential building - Landlord contended that building in question is no, residential building and had rented out the premises to tenant for commercial purposes to run clinic, however, tenant converted the same into residential premises - Evidence on record shows that tenant used..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 14(2)(iii)-- Eviction - Material alterations - Onus is on landlord to prove - It is landlord who has to prove that alterations carried out by tenant have materially impaired the value and utility of the premises - Value and utility has to be seen from the perspective of landlord which has to be substantiated..........

Showing : 31-40 of 490 Results