Showing : 11-20 of 67 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 25F, 17B-- Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen - Automatic reinstatement is not a course to be adopted and the labour court is obliged to take into consideration certain other material to assess and grant the relief to a workman...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Service -- Termination - Workman completed 240 days of continuous service - Non payment of retrenchment compensation sufficient to render termination illegal...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Service-- Transfer of ownership of Company - Workmen, without their consent, cannot be forced to work under different management and in that event, those workmen are entitled to retirement/retrenchment compensation in terms of the Act...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 25F, 33-- Termination - No permission was obtained and admittedly the order of retrenchment relied upon by the Management had been passed when there was reference before the Labour Court for adjudication - The reference had been made in this case and instituted before the Labour Court on 18.7.1989 and the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 25B, 25F, 25G-- Termination - Continuous service - Evident from record that workman had worked from 7.1.1986 to 31.3.1988 - The contractual agreement will not override the mandatory provisions of Section 25B of the Act - Contention of the petitioner management that since the workman was on contractual basis he..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo)-- Retrenchment - The petitioner was engaged on Muster - Roll and the specific period of last engagement of the petitioner completed on 20.2.1989 - Thereafter she was not engaged on Muster - Roll as the land acquisition papers of the project were completed - It cannot be said that the petitioner was..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 25(N), Factories Act, 1948, Section 2(m)-- Respondent-workman claimed reference under Industrial Disputes Act alleging that his termination/retrenchment of service by petitioner-establishment was not valid and justified - Respondent did not utter a word regarding petitioners being an industrial establishment or factory engaged in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 25-- B, 25 - F,25 - G and 25 - H - Termination - Continuous service - Principle of 'last come first go' - Except for short breaks of a few days, the service of workman was extended from time to time and that workman had completed nearly 2 - 1/2 years of service under the management - The definition of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Service-- Retrenchment - Procedural details for seeking prior permission of the appropriate government for carrying out retrenchment u/s 25-N of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 are laid down in Rule 76-A of the Industrial Disputes Central Rules - Application for permission for retrenchment is to be made in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Service-- Retrenchment - Can only be effected by following the provisions laid down under the Act and the Rules - It is not open to the management to make a demand/proposal for retrenchment of workmen and disregarding the provisions of the Act by asking the government to refer the demand/dispute under..........

Showing : 11-20 of 67 Results