Showing : 90-99 of 2242 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 111-- Partition - Application for partition can be filed in respect of more than one khewat and can be entertained by Assistant Collector, provided that co-sharers in different khewats are same - If co-sharers are different in different khewats, then separate applications have to be filed because..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 111, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Partition - Necessary party - Partition proceedings have been carried out without impleading all co-sharers which suffers from vice and even this aspect of matter has not been seen before passing order by Financial Commissioner - Order set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Haryana Utilisation of Surplus and Other Areas Scheme, 1976-- Clause 12 - Sale of allotted land - Resumption of land on account of no, payment of due instalments - Land allotted to allottee `B' by successors-i, interest - `B' will become owner of property only after paying entire instalments and after issuance of sale certificate by State and not merely on..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379-- Appeal against acquittal - Tree was cut and SHO was informed on same date and recovery memo shows that wood and tractor were taken into possession - No demarcation report has been obtained to know that from which area tree was cut - Wood taken in possession/sapurdari was not produced before Court..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Land Revenue (Lambardari) Rules, 1909, Rule 19B-- Lambardar - Appointment - In the instant case, petitioner is not resident of village concerned - Even, documents created by petitioner to show that he is resident of village concerned was made after submission of application for post of Lambardar - However, said aspect not taken into consideration..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 14, 15, 16-- Appointment of Lambardar - Collector has not appointed Lambardar on basis of hereditary claim rather an additional benefit has been given to him only of having some kind of experience of work of Lambardar being in company of his father, who was earlier Lambardar - Petitioner might be retired..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)-- Jumla Mushtarka Malkana Hasb Rasd Khewatwar - Land in dispute was recorded in revenue record as Jumla Mushtarka Malkan Hasab Rasad Arazi Khewat - Defendants-plaintiff being bonafide purchasers, became co-sharers in Jumla Mushtarka Malkan and were put in possession by their vendors - Appellants..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, Section 9(i)(ii), 14(1)(A), Punjab Security of Land Tenures Rules, 1956, Rule 56, Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 44, 45-- Eviction - Respondents seeking eviction of petitioner on ground that petitioner have not paid rent without sufficient cause - Petitioners raised question about status of private respondents of being landlords which has been proved by leading evidence by placing on record jamabandi in which, it is..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, Section 9(i)(ii), 14(1)(A), Punjab Security of Land Tenures Rules, 1956, Rule 56, Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 44, 45-- Landlord and tenant relationship - Petitioners have been paying rent by way of `Batai' to extent of 1/2 share - Rightly, held that petitioners had been tenants of respondents and there was relationship of landlords and tenant between parties for which there was no necessity to get declaration from..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 3, 27-- Mixed question of limitation on facts and law - To be decided on evidence - Even, framing of specific issue is necessary so as to give opportunity to parties to lead evidence - Hence, Court cannot dismiss suit as barred by limitation only on basis of long standing revenue entries in absence of..........

Showing : 90-99 of 2242 Results