Showing : 71-80 of 286 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of proceedings - Apex Court directed lower Court to consider and decide matter expeditiously - Matter seized with lower Court since 01.12.2007 whereby summons were issued to applicants to appear in the case - Said order was modified by same Court by an order..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 5-- Review - By the same Judge/Judges, Bench - If the Judges who made the order in regard to which review is sought continue to be the Judges of the court, they should hear the application for review and not any other Judges unless precluded by death, retirement or absence from the Court for a period..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 114, Order 47, Rule 1-- Review - Grounds - Held, apart from an error apparent on the face of record, on discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the person seeking the review, an order can be reviewed also "for any other sufficient..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Section 7A, 20, 64-- Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007, R.98 - Juvenile - Question of Juvenility raised before Supreme Court for the first time - Claim of Juvenility can be raised at any stage and even after final disposal of the case - Even after disposal of case of juveniles when in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 1, 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 47, Rule 1, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136-- Review petition - Order passed by High Court in second appeal - SLP against said order, dismissed as withdrawn by Supreme Court, on request of counsel, without permission or reservation or liberty for taking further action - Held, dismissal of SLP will not debar parties from moving High Court to..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 18, 21(b)-- Complaint - Dismissal in default - Restoration of complaint - Plea that the State Commission has no power to review its order - Held that since the matter was pending before the State Commission at admission stage, it rightly observed that petitioner has no locus standi to challenge the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 18, 21(b)-- Complaint - Dismissal in default - Restoration of complaint - Plea that the State Commission has no power to review its order - Held that since the matter was pending before the State Commission at admission stage, it rightly observed that petitioner has no locus standi to challenge the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Service-- Disciplinary proceedings - Bank employee - Charge of financial irregularities and of making fraudulent withdrawals deriving pecuniary gain - Charge proved - Order of removal - Reviewing Authority modified the order of punishment and reduced it from removal from service to demotion from the cadre..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1-- Rejection of plaint - Deficient court fee - Review - When order of rejection of the plaint was passed, counsel for plaintiffs failed to point out that plaintiffs had already deposited a substantial amount of Rs.1,74,800/- within permissible time limit which was considered by them as deficient..........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Procedure Code, 1989, Section 114, Order 47, Rule 3-- Civil court - Power to review & recall - Held, in absence of statutory provision, a civil court and other authority has no power to review its own judgments/orders - Court/authority, however, has inherent power to recall its judgment/order, if it is shown that same has been obtained by practicing..........

Showing : 71-80 of 286 Results