Showing : 71-80 of 153 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(1)(a)(ii)-- Revision - Condonation of delay - Delay of 122 days in filing the revision petition - Explanation given for delay - Keeping in view the law laid down by the Supreme Court that to advance substantial justice, the acceptance of explanation should be the rule and refusal an exception, the more so..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Condonation of delay - Delay of 588 days in filing revision - Application does not disclose sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay - Application dismissed - Revision too dismissed as barred by limitation...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(a)(ii)-- Revision petition - Maintainability - Against the original order passed by the District Forum, no appeal filed by the petitioner/complainant before the State Commission - The State Commission's order does not modify the order passed by the District Forum - The complainant is estopped from filing..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Ad Interim stay - Revision - Condonation of delay - Petition filed with delay of 155 days - Neither application for condonation of delay nor any affidavit in that respect filed - Revision petition filed belatedly liable to be dismissed - Would not like to interfere with the discretion exercised by..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15,Second,proviso-- Appeal - Dismissal of appeal for non-deposit of prescribed amount for a period of three years despite repeated opportunities - Revision filed against the order after a delay of 443 days - Sufficient explanation not given - Unable to condone the delay...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Housing - Plot allotment - Delay of 12 years in delivery of possession - 10% interest on deposited money with nominal cost of escalation of Rs. 70,000/ - granted which is less than settled law - Moreover revision by HUDA is barred by limitation as filed after 538 days - Petition dismissed...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Ground that delay caused on account of time spent in getting the Hindi documents translated into English and in getting the copy of Judgment of State Commission from Bhilwara - Held that if the party is negligent or careless in getting the copy, it..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14(2),14(2A),27-- Contempt notice - Notice of penalty signed by the President of the District Forum - Plea that at least one another member should have signed the same - Order of District Forum pursuant to which notice of penalty has been issued not challenged - Revision petition held to be wholly misconceived and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995-- Section 91(2)(h) - Enhancement of Price of Flats - Housing Scheme floated by PUDA - Advertisement inviting applications - Tentative cost of Flats fixed - Clause regarding revision of Price - Undertaking by applicant to abide by the terms and conditions of scheme - Further understanding to pay..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - 29 days delay in filing Revision - Sufficient cause disclosed for condoning delay - Order dismissing revision by not condoning delay set aside and matter remitted to be disposed of on merits in accordance with principles laid down by Supreme Court in Balbir Singh's..........

Showing : 71-80 of 153 Results