LawMirror.com

Results of robbery

Showing : 21-30 of 258 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8 -- Murder and robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Motive - Prosecution alleged that robbery as motive of crime - However, site plan panchnama shows that expensive ornaments like gold, pearl necklace etc. were left behind on person of deceased - No explanation as to why accused would intend to..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Recovery of shirt of accused - Murder and robbery - Mere recovery of shirt of accused at his instance allegedly matched with small broken button found at the scene of crime, would not prove the guilt of accused, particularly when nothing in record to show that shirt is unique and cannot be..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Recovery of motorcycle - Murder and robbery - No evidence on record that motorcycle recovered at the instance of accused belongs to him - Even no attempt made by I.O to enquire about owner of vehicle - PW2, was the witness of seizure of motorcycle - According to him motorcycle was red in color..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Recovery of silver articles - Murder and robbery - Silver articles recovered at the instance of accused is alleged to have been that of deceased - However, no witness identifies silver articles as belonging to any of deceased - In absence of any identification of seized anklet, no reliance can..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Murder and robbery - Circumstantial evidence -Recovery of cash - Cash is not traced back to deceased, as box from which articles were allegedly stolen is not recovered or seen by any witness - Even in FIR there is no averment of any article or money being stolen or lost - Therefore, when money allegedly recovered is being..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 118, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Testimony of child witness - Murder and robbery - PW8 being child witness is not an eye witness to the incident - She was aged about 9 years at the time of incident - Evidence of PW8 is fraught with inconsistencies - None of other witnesses have identified the accused - PW8 did not tell about..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Murder and robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Finger prints Evidence - Expert who examined articles at the place of occurrence and found some finger prints not examined - Person who took the sample finger prints also not examined - No explanation about why articles were just left at the scene after developing finger prints..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Murder and robbery - Forensic evidence - Findings of hair analysis are inconclusive - Report only concluded the specimen to human hair - Same is not sufficient to substantiate presence of accused - Forensic evidence held, insufficient...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34 -- Murder and robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen evidence - Prosecution relied upon evidence of PW8 to show that accused and victims were last seen together - However, PW8 in her evidence stated that accused had come one day before in night and next day deceased persons died - PW8 is a child witness, neither she..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 394, 397, Explosives Act, 1884, Section 9(B)(i)(b) -- Robbery - Bomb explosion - Quashing of proceedings - Materials available on record reveals prima facie case against petitioner - Acquittal of co-accused in separate trial has not disproved substratum of prosecution case - Petitioner cannot derive any benefit of that acquittal judgment to..........

Showing : 21-30 of 258 Results