Showing : 231-240 of 433 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 133, 114(b)-- Accomplice - Corroboration - Need not be direct evidence that the accused committed the crime - It is sufficient if there is merely a circumstantial evidence of his connection with the crime...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114(g), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 20, Rule 5-- Fact stated in judgment as to what transpired at the hearing is conclusive of the facts so stated and no one can contradict such statements by affidavit or other evidence - If facts so stated are not correct then it is incumbent upon the party to call the attention of the very Judges, who have so..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67, 114, General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 27-- Service of notice - Proof - Onus to prove - Notice sent through registered cover - Returned with endorsement/report 'unclaimed' - Report of postman is in discharge of his official duties - Report carries presumption of correctness - Postman not required to be examined to prove the endorsement -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Notice - There is presumption that when an Advocate sends a notice on behalf of a client, the notice is sent by him on instructions from his client...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Notice - There is presumption that when an Advocate sends a notice on behalf of a client, the notice is sent by him on instructions from his client...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Illus. (e) - Concession - Recorded in judgment on facts which are not on record - Appellate Court not proper forum to dispute concession - Appropriate application before the Court who recorded such concession should have been filed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 27, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Foreclosure proceedings - Registered envelope tendered by postman to the address - Refusal - There is due service effected upon the addressee by refusal - However, presumptions under both the Secs. of the Act are rebuttable. On Facts - In the instant case said presumption stands rebutted by the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Non production of best available evidence - Adverse inference rightly drawn against the petitioner...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Adverse inference - Tenant raising construction - Application for seeking permission of landlord not filed - An adverse inference in that behalf must be drawn...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Adverse inference - Non production of a letter - Inference can be drawn that either DW2 did not tell the truth that such a letter was written and/or an adverse inference can be drawn that had the letter been produced, the same would have gone against the interest of Respondent No.1...........

Showing : 231-240 of 433 Results