Showing : 11-20 of 79 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Partnership firm - Complaint against partners of firm without arraigning partnership firm as an accused - Held, complaint is not maintainable...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Proprietorship firm - Proprietor alone is liable - Concept of vicarious liability is not attracted in a case of proprietorship firm - Process issued against Manager of proprietorship concern, quashed...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Directors - Vicarious liability - Allegations against petitioners are very vague - No specific role has been assigned to them - It is not disclosed how they are responsible for day to day affairs of company - Rules and regulations of Bank does not empower..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Partnership firm - Partners - Pleading that accused Nos.2 to 5, being the persons responsible for the affairs of accused No.1 and also being involved in day-to-day functioning of accused No.1 firm, they are jointly and severally liable to be prosecuted - There is also..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Partnership firm - Petitioner shown as proprietor and reply to notice not given - Adverse inference cannot be drawn against petitioner...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Partnership firm - Proceedings against petitioner without arraying the firm as an accused - Held, once it is established that it is partnership firm and cheque was issued by managing partner of firm, arraying firm as an accused is necessary - Proceedings against petitioner..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by proprietorship firm - Quashing of complaint - Cheque issued in favour of respondent No.1/complainant on behalf of firm got dishonoured - Petitioners/accused prosecuted as partners of firm - Respondent No.1 was not sure whether said firm was partnership or..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by firm - Quashing of proceedings - Cheque issued on behalf of firm got dishonoured - Cheque in question signed by one Mr.'C' - Petitioner No.1 neither signed cheque nor is proprietor of firm - Held, petitioner No.1 cannot be held liable for criminal prosecution with..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued by firm - Complaint against partner of firm - Complaint not filed against principal accused, the firm - No averment in complaint that partner was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of the firm at the time of commission of offence - Entire..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by firm - Quashing of proceedings - Respondent No.1/complainant has stated in his reply that he had filed a complaint u/s.138 N.I. Act against petitioner under a belief that he was one of partners of firm whereas he came to know later on that firm is a proprietorship..........

Showing : 11-20 of 79 Results