Showing : 1-10 of 120 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 341, 34-- Murder - Common intention - A2 and A3 are brothers of A-1 - Though A-2 and A-3 are present on the spot but they were not armed - No evidence brought on record that there was prior meeting of minds between accused and A-2 and A-3 were having knowledge that their brother A-1 was armed with katta -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 341, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25(1A), 27-- Murder - Recovery of pistol and FSL report - Recovery effected from house of A-1 on his confessional statement - FSL report shows that pistol recovered was in working condition and fatal injuries could be caused from using said pistol - Three eye witnesses have attributed specific overt act of..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304(Part II), 324, 341, 147, 148, 149-- Offence u/ss 304(Part II), 324, 341, 147, 148, 149 IPC - Fifteen named accused and some unnamed accused were mentioned in complaint itself - However, no motive alleged in the complaint - No independent witnesses examined apart from injured witnesses to prove prosecution case - Even injured..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 332, 457, 427, 341, 504, 506, 34-- Criminal trespass and hurt - Petitioner no.1 is daughter-in-law of complainant was in possession of a room much prior to alleged incident as per order of Court under PWDV Act - Allegations in complaint that petitioners forcibly entered into the house of complainant are false - More so, complainant..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 325, 341, 323, 294, 448, 506, 354-- Offence u/ss 325, 341, 323, 294, 448, 506, 354 IPC - Order taking cognizance - No prima facie evidence on record to show that A-1 voluntarily caused any grievous hurt to complainant as designated u/s 320 IPC - Basic ingredients of S.325 IPC thus, not attracted - However, there is prima facie..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 326, 341-- Acid attack - Settlement - Love affair between parties - Incident occurred on refusal of victim to marry accused - Accused threw acid on the face and shoulder of victim - Matter between parties amicably settled - Both the parties married to each other and decided to lead a peaceful life and also..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 304(Part II), 341, 34-- Nature of offence - Deceased suffered 20 injuries and no single injury opined to be caused by blunt weapon was fatal - Cause of death is cumulative effect of multiple ante mortem injuries - Accused thus, had knowledge that injuries caused are likely to cause death but they had no intention to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 298, 323, 324, 341, 307, 302, 34-- Bail - Offence u/ss 298, 323, 324, 341, 307, 302, 34 IPC - Incident occurred over issue of seats sharing etc. in train and there is neither any evidence of any preplanning to cause incident deliberately or intentionally to cause communal disharmony - There is not even remote whisper that..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 451, 323, 341, 382, 147, 149, 504, 506-- Quashing of FIR - Compromise - Offence u/ss 451, 323, 341, 382, 147, 149, 504, 506 IPC - Parties resolved to settle their dispute amicably and accordingly entered into a compromise - Both the parties categorically stated on oath that to maintain cordial relations with each other they resolved to..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 448, 341, 380, 34-- Trespass and theft - Specific allegations levelled in FIR that petitioners trespassed into portioned premises under occupation of complainant in her absence and stole goods lying there - Merely because petitioners claim that they were in possession of some portion of same premises would not mean..........

Showing : 1-10 of 120 Results