Showing : 1771-1780 of 2178 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Himachal Pradesh Agriculture Produce Market Act, 1949, Section 2(a), 2(h), 2(i), 4(3), 21-- Both Khairwood and Katha are agricultural produce - The respondent buys Khairwood from producers and manufacturers Katha - Respondent is not grower of Khairwood as such cannot claim exemption from obtaining licence u/s 4(3) - Processing Khairwood within the specified market - Respondent is liable..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 4(3), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 427-- Planned action to murder SSP to create terror in the minds of public at large - Deliberate parking of truck on wrong side, with engine on and appellant's sudden dashing against staff car of SSP - Evidence on record of eye wit-nesses and others - Conviction and sentence upheld...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4(1)-- Notification published in Newspaper before it was actually published in the Gazette - Held, this is only an irregularity in the procedural steps and it does not vitiate the validity of the notification published in the Gazette...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 23-- Sale instances of small extent of land - Cannot form reasonable basis to determine higher compensation for vast extent of land...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 23(1A), 28-- Compensation allowed at the rate of Rs.4800/- per acre - On reference compensation allowed at-Rs.20.000/- per acre - High Court in appeal confirmed the same - On facts held, the reasonable compen-sation will be Rs. 10, 000/- per acre with solatium at 30% under Section 23(2), interest u/s 28 at 9%..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 17, 4, 5A-- No mention in notification under Section 4 that land waste or arable nor stated that in the opinion of Government there was any urgency to take recourse to provisions of Section 17-Not by itself enough to strike down notification where expression of opinion with regard to urgency involved in the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4(1), 23(1)-- In view of policy decision of Govt. lands located within ABCD lined marked on Shajra plan are to be released from acqui-sition - If, however they are situated outside the ABCD line then date of construction of shops is to be enquired into to find out if they were constructed prior to notification..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 23-- Sale deeds - Proof- Neither the vendor nor vendee of sale deeds examined in proof of passing consideration - Only a clerk of Sub Registrar called as witness to prove the sale deeds - Held, other factors aliunde had to be established that sale deeds offered comparable value for determining..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 23-- Well - Claimants are not entitled to the value of the well since well was being used for irrigation of the land acquired...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4(1), 3(f)-- Planned development of Delhi - Held, notification is not vitiated on account of the fact that planned development was not specified with particularisation of the land in question needed for the public pur-pose - Validity of the notification upheld...........

Showing : 1771-1780 of 2178 Results