Showing : 21-30 of 37 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(d), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2-- As security of loan, sale deed executed on 5.5.1953 - Oral agreement that on return of loan amount re-conveyance deed shall be executed - Entire loan amount paid on 25.3.1987 - Suit for declaration of title and injunction filed on 26.8.1996 - Suit for mere declaration is not maintainable in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 7-- Bribe - Accused a clerk in the Office of Sub Registrar - Complainant a document writer - Complaint suppressed the fact that he is a document writer and stated that he was doing agricultural work - Casts doubt that complainant is not a truthful witness when seen in the context that the purpose for..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 58-- Not applicable where plaintiff in possession - Cause of action to seek declaration that plaintiff is owner in possession - Does not arise on the date of execution of sale deed and/or mutation - Cause of action would arise only when there is any threat to title of plaintiff - Mere wrong entry of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Agreement to sell-- Specific performance - Suit for - Sale deed was to be executed after partition - Order of partition made on 16.11.1970 and Sanad Taqseem prepared on 20.4.1971 and mutation sanctioned on 15.6.1971 - Limitation to file suit starts to run on 15.6.1971...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Suit for declaration to be owner in possession - Sale deed in the year 1964 in favour of plaintiff and sale deed in the year 1971 in favour of defendant - Actual possession not reflected in the revenue record in favour of plaintiff - There is also no copy of mutation in favour of the plaintiff..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34, 35, 36, 37-- Mutation on the basis of registered sale - deed - Objection that unless possession is transferred mutation cannot be effected and sale - deed cannot be acted upon - Not tenable - Possession deemed to be transferred if - (i) physically transferred, or (ii) mention to that effect made in sale -..........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 34, 35, 36, 37-- Mutation on the basis of registered sale deed - Sale deed purporting to transfer land owned by Mushtarka Malkan - Co - sharer cannot transfer more than his share in joint land - Vendor failed to show extent of share in joint holding and exclusive possession of Khasra Nos. sought to be alienated -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 23-- Mutation of sale - Cannot prove sale price of land until and unless sale deed of land is produced/proved on the record of the case...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2-- Later suit for specific performance instituted during pendency of earlier suit for injunction - Agreement of sale provided that before execution of sale deed vendor would obtain Income-tax clearance certificate and get mutation sanctioned in his favour and send intimation to vendee well before..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Addition of a person as a defendant without consent of plaintiff - Only in exceptional cases - Court where finds that addition of new defendant is necessary to, effectively adjudicate the matter in controversy between the parties - Even without consent of plaintiff such a person can be added as a..........

Showing : 21-30 of 37 Results