Showing : 1781-1790 of 4436 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, 92-- Execution sale - Setting aside of - Ex-parte decree which is basis of auction sale itself is vitiated on account of fraud played on Court as held by lower Court while setting aside the ex-parte decree - Held, auction sale ought to have been set aside...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r)-- Unfair trade practice - Advertisement - Car booking - Mercedes Benz E - 250D - Booking of complainant matured in May, 1997 and he paid balance price of the car and took delivery without any stipulation about the replacement of the vehicle by an upgraded model in case a new model was launched..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, 92-- Execution sale - Application to set aside sale - Not pressed - Effect of - Held, as per R.92 unless an application made u/r 89 or 90 or 91 is disallowed, Court shall not make an order confirming the sale - Said rule nowhere mentions the fate of an application which has not been pressed - Hence,..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 64(2), Order 21, Rule 58, Registration Act, 1908, Section 47-- Registration of sale deed after attachment but executed before attachment - No reliance can be placed on S.47 Registration Act which reads that registration relates back to date of execution of document in view of S.64(2) CPC which is very clear that registration of sale deed made subsequent to..........
ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HYDERABAD
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Housing - Agreement to sell two houses - Alleged nonperformance of contract and non - delivery of possession - Contention of the respondent that since the complainant did not pay the balance amount despite repeated reminders and intimations it had returned the cheques while cancelling the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, Section 51(4)-- Auction sale - Rejection of bid by Administrator - Administrator, HUDA, not competent to take decision - Plaintiff filed suit raising challenge against rejection order not passed by competent authority and by way of consequential relief, sought direction to HUDA to issue letter of allotment to him..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, Section 51(4)-- Auction sale - It is only the Chief Administrator who can accept or reject the bid - Rejection of bid by Administrator - Administrator not competent to take decision - No notification had been issued by State Government delegating the powers of Chief Administrator to any other Authority or..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22, 61, 85, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18(c), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, Rules 65 and 66 - FIR lodged u/ss 22, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act against accused - Accused chemist by business and was carrying sale of medicines with salt (Dextropropoxyphene , Diphenoxylate, paracetamol and Diclomine), without a valid drug license and valid..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 54, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 31, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 59-- Sale deed - Cancellation - Limitation - Prayer for declaration that sale deed is null and void - Unless deed of sale is cancelled the transfer cannot be held to be null and void - Suit for cancellation of sale deed is governed by Art.59 of Limitation Act - Limitation to file suit is three years -..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 6-- Exemption from limitation - Suit for cancellation of sale deed filed beyond limitation - No pleading in the plaint seeking exemption from limitation in terms of O.7.R.6 CPC - Held, plaintiff cannot agitate exemption from limitation for the first time in second appeal - Suit was barred by..........

Showing : 1781-1790 of 4436 Results