Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 18(2), Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Section 20(3), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 29(2)-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Question as to whether Appellate Tribunal under SARFAESI Act was a Court for the purposes of S.29(2) of Limitation Act, is not required to be decided as S.29(2) Limitation Act is not applicable to SARFAESI Act - Even if S.29(2) of Limitation Act does not apply to..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 227, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190, 195, 340, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 191, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 13, 14-- Giving false evidence - Quashing of proceedings - Held, merely because there was some calculation mistake committed by petitioner (officer of bank), it cannot be said that it was done with mala fides so as to proceed against him personally invoking S.340 Cr.P.C. - He had only acted in good faith..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 34, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14-- Matter provided in SARFAESI Act - Jurisdiction of Consumer Forum - Held, the CDRF cannot grant any relief against measures taken by a Bank or Financial Institution under the SARFAESI Act - The jurisdiction of the CDRF to deal with matters provided for in the SARFAESI Act is expressly excluded -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, 136, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Section 14, 17-- Writ jurisdiction - Recovery of debt by bank - High Court should not pass interim stay order - It should insist the petitioner first to exhaust effective alternative remedy which was available to the petitioner under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act...........

Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results