Showing : 451-460 of 2739 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Accused ready to pay double the cheque amount - On deposit, proceedings shall be treated to be closed...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Cheque was issued at `B' and the same was presented and dishonoured at `B' - Complainant residing at `P' and notice also issued from `P' - Held, court at `P' had territorial jurisdiction to try complaint...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Account freezed by IT Department - Accused was aware that account of which cheque is drawn is attached yet he issued same in discharge of legal debt - Prosecution not liable to be quashed...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of complaint sought on ground of jurisdictional error - Petitioner resident of Jaipur and does not have either a residence or place of work in Delhi - Cheque in question was drawn on back in Jaipur and was dishonoured by that bank at Jaipur - Notice of demand was not..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque signed by accused in the capacity of Director of the Company - Sufficient averments in complaint to satisfy the requirements of S.141 of the Act - Order setting aside issuance of summoning order set aside - Complaint restored for decision in accordance with law...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Legally enforceable debt - Accused in his statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C. admitted that he had dealing with the complainant and issued cheque which could be encashed by the accused - Held, there is presumption with regard to the act that it was against legally enforceable..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Director - Mechanical repetition of the requirements u/s 141(1) of the Act is not sufficient - There should be necessary averments in the complaint as to how and in what manner the accused was guilty of consent and connivance or negligence and therefore, responsible..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Legally enforceable debt - Presumption - Signatures and execution of cheque admitted - Presumption available does not stand rebutted by merely saying that cheque was neither given for business transaction nor for a liability...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Vicarious liability - Principles governing - (i) The primary responsibility is on the complainant to make specific averments as are required under the law in the complaint so as to make the accused vicariously liable - For fastening the criminal liability, there is no..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Postal receipt issued on the proforma meant for telephone bill - Postal receipt revealing that it was issued with regard to registered post letter and not for telephone bill...........

Showing : 451-460 of 2739 Results