Showing : 11-14 of 14 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Plaintiff not coming in the witness box - Adverse inference - Held, adverse inference can only be drawn when there is no other evidence on record on the point in issue...........
SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Witness of plaintiff admitting that plaintiff had with him the record of property - Record not produced - Held, failure to produce record raises presumption that had record been produced, it would not have supported plaintiffs case...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1993
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Suit for specific performance - Plaintiff not himself appearing as a witness - Absence of any valid explanation - Court is entitled to draw an adverse inference against him...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1993
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 16(c), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Suit for specific performance - Plaintiff himself not appearing as a witness - Absence of any valid explanation - Court can draw an adverse inference against him - Evidence on record not sufficient to prove that the plaintiff was always ready and willing to perform his part of the contract - No..........

Showing : 11-14 of 14 Results