Showing : 1431-1440 of 4594 Results

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e)-- Disproportionate assets - Burden of proof - Held, it is burden of prosecution to prove that person, accused of having been found in possession of assets disproportionate to his known sources of income, is proved beyond reasonable doubt to have been found in possession of property disproportionate..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e)-- Disproportionate assets - Burden of proof - Accused alleged to have amassed assets disproportionate to his known source of income - Assessment of valuation of immovable and movable properties of accused could not be proved - Held, prosecution failed to establish that accused had been found in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Complainant giving suggestions about the place where the search should be conducted - Possibility of complainant himself concealing the notes without knowledge of accused with the objective of getting the accused entrapped in the case is not ruled out in the case -..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Appeal against acquittal - Acquittal upheld - Theory regarding demand of bribe found uncorroborated - No verification of demand was attempted by seizure officer - Amount was not recovered from personal search of accused - Numerous cases of defalcation pending against..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), 2(c), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 21-- Public servant - Definition in S.21 IPC and S.2(c) of 1988 Act are different - Decisions rendered while interpreting S.21 of IPC which in substance and content are substantially different than S.2(c) have no bearing at all for decision of case for an offence under Prevention of Corruption Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), 2(c)-- Illegal gratification - Public servant - Municipal Councillor - He is a public servant within the meaning of S.2(c) of the Act - Sub-section (viii) of S.2(c) of the Act makes any person, who holds an office by virtue of which he is authorized or required to perform any public duty, to be a public..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(ii)-- Eviction - Personal necessity - Held, landlord need not prove his financial status or explain business to be set up by him while seeking ejectment on ground of personal necessity to run his own business from demised premises...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(ii)-- Eviction - Personal necessity - Held, it is not for tenant to dictate terms to landlord as to how else he should adjust himself without getting tenanted premises vacated - Personal necessity of landlord is to be judged from his view point...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(ii), 13(3)(a)(iii), 15-- Eviction - Personal necessity - Revisional jurisdiction - Exercise of - Held, finding of appellate authority on question of bonafide requirement in a revision petition can be interfered with only if such finding of fact is perverse or arbitrary or pleadings in eviction petition are not conforming..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(v)-- Eviction - Cease to occupy - Revisional jurisdiction - Both authorities below, on appreciation of evidence on record, have recorded a concurrent finding that petitioner/tenant has ceased to occupy shop in dispute - Held, question whether petitioner has ceased to occupy shop in dispute or not is a..........

Showing : 1431-1440 of 4594 Results