Showing : 31-40 of 115 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Ascertainment of age of ink in signature, other contents in the cheque and number of pens used for filling in it by an expert of Forensic Science - Application filed belatedly after taking nearly fifteen adjournments - Held, request was meant only to procastinate the pending..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Comparison of disputed signature or writing by an expert - When a contention is raised that complainant had misused the cheque, then an opportunity must be granted to the accused for adducing evidence in rebuttal thereof - Cheque, allowed to be sent to handwriting expert...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73- - Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - It is not case of complainant that notice was sent to accused through postal authorities or through courier services - Accused did not enter witness box and denied signature found on copy of notice - Held, in absence of opinion of expert, trial Court..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Prayer for sending cheque to laboratory - Refusal of - Validity - Petitioner/accused contended that figure "4" has been added in cheque - It has not been disputed that FSL has opined that "4" figure in cheque appears to be similar to that of other writing on cheque -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of proceedings - Factum of lending Rs.3,70,000/- as well as signature on cheque in question not denied by petitioner - Contention that cheque cannot be presented twice - Held, no restriction on presentation of any cheque repeatedly within period stipulated in Act -..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65-- Dishonour of cheque - Secondary evidence - Grant of permission - Validity - Application preferred by complainant u/s.65 of Evidence Act not supported by affidavit - It did not give full particulars and was under signature of a counsel appearing for complainant - Contention on behalf of complainant..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque- Conviction - Validity - Case of respondent/complainant that cheques issued by petitioner/accused to re-pay loan amount got dishonoured - Defence plea of petitioner that she had lost two cheque books, all cheque leaves of which were duly signed by her - It was a false and..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Cheque was returned by bank stating that "Property not properly marked" since cheque in dispute contains signature of A1 as proprietor of A2 company and only if he had delivered cheque in his individual name, it could have been honoured - As per expert..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Conviction - Revision - Respondent/complainant has specifically stated that legal notice was issued on petitioner/accused - In support of his contention, he has produced a copy of legal notice along with postal acknowledgement - Courts below have concurrently found that legal..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Comparison of signatures by an expert - In the case of denial of signature by the drawer of a cheque, the best witness would be the concerned Bank Manager and not a handwriting expert...........

Showing : 31-40 of 115 Results