Showing : 91-100 of 309 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38-- Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction - Declaration sought that suit property is ancestral property and it cannot be divested by father of plaintiff by way of relinquishment deed - No material adduced by plaintiff that suit land was ancestral property and plaintiff having..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Suit for declaration of title - Defendant in possession - Suit for mere declaration without seeking relief of possession is not maintainable...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38-- Suit for declaration and perpetual injunction - Ancestral property - Plaintiff born before date of vesting, so he got share equivalent to defendant No.1 in the property of Sir and khudkasht along with his father/defendant No.1 - However, name of father recorded in revenue record as `Karta' of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 14, 34-- Contract of personal service - Cannot be specifically enforced - Termination of service of an employee by a private company, at best, gives right to aggrieved employee to sue for compensation in money - Suit for declaration that termination is illegal is not maintainable...........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Declaration of title - Payment of land revenue to Govt. - Does not create any right or title or interest in immovable property - At best, those documents would establish that land revenue was paid to revenue department for the property owned or possessed - Those documents do not confer any title..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Suit for declaration on the basis of adverse possession - Suit is not maintainable...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38-- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction on the basis of adverse possession - Suit for declaration on the basis of adverse possession is not maintainable - Plaintiff, since established his possession, decree of permanent injunction rightly granted in his favour...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 37-- Suit for declaratory and injunction - Right claimed as no, occupancy tenant on rent basis - Plaintiff was unable to prove his plea that owner of suit property executed gift deed of 4 biswas and not 4 bighas in favour of education department and his possession over suit property is as no, occupancy..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38, 39-- Suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction - Ex parte evidence - Defendants not contested the suit and proceeded ex parte - Plaintiff by way of his ex parte evidence proved its case that she along with defendant Nos.1 and 3 purchased the property and verbal settlement arrived at..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, Land Acquisition Act, 1894-- Suit for declaration of title - Once title of respondent No.3 was firmly established, appellants were duty bound to rebut these evidences and establish their title and possession - Appellants failed to lead any evidence as to their title - Concurrent findings of Special Tribunal and Special Court..........

Showing : 91-100 of 309 Results