LawMirror.com

Results of s 34 specific relief

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 121-130 of 480 Results

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of title and possession - Plea of ownership on basis of Will by defendant - Executor of Will acquiring title over property by adverse possession but no substantiated material is placed on record with regard to that - Hence, where adverse possession of executor of Will is not proved by evidence, defendant..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction that disconnection of electricity is illegal - Electricity restored within three days of its disconnection - Suit itself has become redundant...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration - Suit as per S.34 Proviso of the Act, can be dismissed only if plaintiffs are entitled to further relief which has not been prayed for - Once plaintiffs were not entitled to any further relief, S.34 Proviso of the Act would have no application...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Simpliciter suit for injunction - Defendant denied title of plaintiff as vendor of plaintiff was not having any right and title to sell the suit property - Thus serious dispute raised by defendant as to plaintiffs title as such there was need for plaintiff to amend the plaint and convert the suit into one for declaration - Defendant..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Filed on basis of apprehension that defendant/husband my sell the house - Concurrent findings of three Courts below dismissing suit of plaintiff - However, since the second wife of husband and daughter born to second wife failed to prove title over suit property in separate suit..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Plaintiff proved to be in possession of property - However, bother-in-law of father of plaintiff is trustee of property and he would be entitled to administer the property as per last wishes of father of plaintiff - Plaintiff thus, has no interest in suit property - Since trustee..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration that plaintiff along with defendants are co-sharers and sale deed executed by defendant No.1 is null and void - Plaintiff categorically stated that suit land was purchased by his father/defendant No.1 from son of their paternal uncle - Suit property thus, not ancestral property but self acquired property of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction - Plaintiffs unable to furnish necessary documentary and oral evidence to prove their claim - Defendant on the other hand put the earlier order involving same property in which is it was held that suit property is related to temple and plaintiff is staying therein to..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Rejection of plaint - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction that sale deed executed by defendant Nos.1 to 6 in favour of defendant No.7 is not binding on plaintiff and restraining defendants from alienating or encumbering or creating third party rights - Plaintiff in possession..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration - Mutation entries - Entries made in mutation register by Patwari in discharge of his public duties or orders passed thereon by Revenue Officer would be a relevant evidence u/s 35 of Evidence Act - In present case, mutation in favour of executant's son was given effect to in record of rights i.e. Jamabandi of..........

Showing : 121-130 of 480 Results