Showing : 81-90 of 410 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366-- Offence u/s 366 - Reduction of sentence - 33 years have passed since from the incident - Accused `P' and `H' are now 78 years and 65 years old - Both accused remained in custody for about 3 months and 8 months respectively - Considering the conduct and age of two accused, sending them back to jail..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376-- Kidnapping and rape of 18 years old girl - Taking prosecutrix forcibly on scooter to bus stand and from there to Naina Devi temple - No alarm raised by prosecutrix even though visiting different places on scooter and on public transport - No signs of any force was seen by medical officer and there..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 376, Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 4-- Kidnapping and rape - Testimony of prosecutrix - Prosecutrix was above 18 years of age at the time of incident - She herself admitted that letter on record was in her handwriting, disclosing her plan to accused as to how she would leave her house and join him - Prosecutrix lived with accused for..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366A, 376, 109, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 3, 4-- Bail - Kidnapping and rape - Petitioner not named in FIR - Prosecutrix did not name petitioner in her earlier statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. - Co-accused already granted bail - Bail granted...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 376-- Kidnapping and rape - Prosecutrix was 18-19 years old at the time of alleged occurrence - Accused was known to prosecutrix and they had intimated relations with each other - It is not the case of prosecutrix that accused has made the prosecutrix to sit in the bus forcibly - Prosecutrix had..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 376-- Kidnapping and rape - Testimony of prosecutrix - Prosecutrix attained the age of majority at or before the time of incident - FIR and statement of witnesses of fact are based on either suspicion and apprehension or on hearsay evidences and do not support the facts of charge - Prosecutrix herself..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 419, 376-- Kidnaping and rape - Love affair between prosecutrix and accused - Prosecutrix was above 16 years of age at the time of incident - She accompanied accused of her own and stayed with him without making any complaint to anyone though she had ample opportunity at every stage till she reached the..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 344, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376(2)(g)-- Abduction and rape - Prosecutrix changing her version again and again and giving false statement in Court - It is still to be decided as to which part of the statement is false - Proceedings drawn by trial Court u/s 344 Cr.P.C. shall proceed in accordance with law - Conviction of accused set..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376(2)(g)-- Abduction and rape - Conviction on the statement of victim - Prosecutrix changing her versions again and again and thus she is wholly unreliable witness - In case prosecution is based on wholly unreliable testimony of a single witness, Court has no option but to acquit the accused - Accused..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, 228, 397, 401, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 34, 36, 376(2)(g), 366-- Framing of charge - Revision against - Allegations against revisionists that victim was raped by co-accused in furtherance of common intention of co-accused - Held, there is no illegality or impropriety in impugned order framing charges against revisionists - Petition dismissed...........

Showing : 81-90 of 410 Results