LawMirror.com

Results of s 11a of industrial disputes act

Showing : 11-20 of 47 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Power of Labour Court and/or Industrial Tribunal to interfere with the quantum of punishment cannot be denied but the same should be exercised judiciously...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo) , 11A -- Misconduct - Termination - Non holding of enquiry - With reference to Section 11A of ID Act management produced evidence before the Labour Court and justified its action with regard to order of termination - Merely for the reason that an inquiry has not been held before the order of termination was passed by the..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Misconduct - Confession - Non voluntary confession - Production of witness - Burden of proof - Plea of workman that the Manager and Accountant before whom writing was inked were not examined by the management to prove the writing - The onus to prove that the writing was obtained from the workman was not voluntary, was on the..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo) , 11A -- Termination - Quantum of punishment - The misconduct is of very serious nature which is of teasing and molesting a female worker in the factory - He indeed used the abusive language as is apparent from the admission note of the workman - The punishment of termination imposed by the management by no stretch of..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Reinstatement - Without continuity in service - The workman after having been reinstated and that too on the same post, from which he was terminated, the continuity of service would follow - Depriving the same would amount to break in service, which would be totally contrary to the relief of reinstatement in service...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Apparent from the pleadings and evidence led by the parties that both the parties had accepted the order dated 15.3.1982 passed by the Apex Court and have given effect thereto - In compliance of that order the parties have led their respective evidence on merits of the charges framed by the Management against the workman and on..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo) , 25F , 11A -- Termination - Absence from duty - Submission made by respondent with regard to the workman participating in strike, his absence from duty and indulging in Trade Union activities held to be of no consequence as the ground on the which termination order based is absence from duty - Subsequent ground taken by..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Termination - Finding the enquiry not fair - Labour Court granted opportunity to the Management to lead evidence - On evidence being lead by the Management order of termination found justified - It can not be said that the order of termination would relate to the date of passing of the award - It would relate back to the date,..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Termination - Retrospective termination - Vide order dated 6.11.1984 termination of service of petitioner workman w.e.f. 21.2.1984 - Held that order of termination cannot have retrospective effect - Award of the Labour Court answering against workman upheld with modification that he will be entitled to all benefits under the..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Back wages - The findings given by the Labour Court that the enquiry held against him was not in accordance with law - Labour Court had not exonerated the workman from the charges levelled against - In view of the serious irregularity which is alleged to have been committed by the workman grant of 50% of the back wages upheld...........

Showing : 11-20 of 47 Results