Showing : 851-860 of 5210 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Company and its Directors are not liable when cheque is drawn by an employee of company on his personal account for discharging dues of company and its Directors...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Managing Director - When accused is Managing Director then specific averment that accused was incharge and responsible for affairs of the company is not required as Managing Director by virtue of his position is liable to be proceeded with...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Liability - A person who draws a cheque on an account maintained by him for paying the payee, alone attracts liability...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 269SS-- Dishonour of cheque - Appeal against acquittal - As per complainant, he advanced loan of Rs.7 lacs to accused and accused issued cheque for repayment of same - In terms of S.269-SS of 1961 Act, any advance by way of loan for more than Rs.20,000/- has to be made by account payee cheque only - Cash..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, 118-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Accused denying his signatures on cheque - Presumption u/s 118, 139 of the Act, does not arise until signatures on cheque are admitted...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 118, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Rebuttal - Available, if same is rebutted on basis of cross examination of witnesses of complainant and other material evidence on record - It is not mandatory for accused to enter into witness box for purpose of rebuttal of presumption...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Post dated cheque - When post dated or blank cheques are issued and issuance of cheque is not in dispute, it will be difficult to accept that there was no transaction between parties - Court cannot hold accused guilty only because it comes to conclusion that there was some..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Friendly loan - There appears to be very close relationship between husband of complainant and accused - However, under what circumstances, amounts were paid to accused, how much amount was actually paid to her and under what circumstances cheque was obtained from her, is not..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Principle that criminal charge must be proved beyond reasonable doubt applies to offences punishable u/s 138 of the Act - Presumption u/s 118 and 139 of the Act do not do away with necessity of proving accusation beyond reasonable doubt...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Funds insufficient - Friendly loan - Accused admitted his signatures on cheque as well as on two pronotes and the fact that he borrowed loan from complainant - Once pronote has been signed and executed by accused, it acts as an acknowledgement of transaction - Presumption..........

Showing : 851-860 of 5210 Results