No Result Found

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Additional remedy - Estoppel - When order has been passed by a Competent Authority under law on representation/appeal filed by a consumer the complainant is estopped from filing a complaint before the Consumer Forum against the order passed by State Government on representation...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3,2(1),(d), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Additional remedy - Estoppel - Consumer - Respondent already opted for a certain route for redressal of a grievance relating to per sq. yard price of plot - He was no more the owner of the plot having passed on the interest of the plot to somewhere else with permission to sell upon his undertaking..........
PUNJAB AND HARYAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Estoppel - Illegal and unauthorised possession - Suit for possession - Dispute regarding demarcation and identity of suit land - Dismissed by trial Court - Decreed by Appellate Court on the report of Local Commissioner - Issue `Whether the plaintiff is estopped by his own act and conduct from..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Estoppel - Plea for withdrawal of statement - By counsel on the ground that counsel had carried misconception of facts and failed to take instructions - However, it does not stand to reason that experienced advocate appearing in high profile case for client holding responsible political office..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Estoppel - Principles of estoppel do not operate at the level of Government policy...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Estoppel - Speech made in Parliament by a Minister cannot be treated as a promise or representation made to a person attracting the principle of promissory estoppel...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Estoppel - Suit for possession and recovery of damages on account of use and occupation of land -Plaintiffs claimed the suit land on the basis of their title - Defendants denied ownership of plaintiffs - Claimed themselves to be owner in possession of the suit land - In jamabandi status of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Promissory estoppel - Applicability against Govt. - Govt. making representation or promise to an individual - Said individual altering his position by acting upon such promise - Govt. may be required to make good that promise - Shall not be allowed to fall back upon the formal defect, subject to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 6, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Estoppel - Factory setup in 1981 after taking proper permission - Notification to acquire said land - Objections filed - Land released from acquisition - There after petitioners invested in the development of area and their business progressed considerably, paying taxes to the tune of Rs. 11.60..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115-- Promissory Estoppel - Doctrine is not based on the principle of Estoppel - Evolved by equity in order to prevent injustice - Doctrine cannot be invoked to compel a party to do any act prohibited by law - There cannot be estoppel against the statute...........

No Result Found