Showing : 31-40 of 772 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Landlord required the demised premises for settling his son independently - However, evidence on record shows that son was already running his business - Moreso, landlords were having other property, but the details of the same had not been furnished by them - Landlord has not come to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Mesne profits - Tenancy created in the year 1981 - Rent fixed @ Rs.500 p.m - Mesne profits fixed by appellate Authority @ Rs.20,000 p.m, is without any tool bar is not justified and is a fanciful assessment without any registered lease deed having placed on record by landlord - Impugned..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148-- Extension of time - Payment of provisional rent - Conditional eviction order was passed and compliance was to be made within two months - However, rent was still not deposited till 5.9.2014 whereas last date to deposit the same was 2.4.2012 - Bonafide of tenant was missing from day one - Moreover,..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1, East Punjab urban Rent Restriction Act, 1948, Section 13(3)(a)(i), Order 23, Rule 1- - Eviction petition - Withdrawal at appellate stage - Eviction petition on ground of personal necessity - Non pleading of mandatory requirement that landlord is not occupying residential building in the area concerned and that he has not vacated such a building without sufficient cause - This is..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(i)-- Eviction - Non-payment of rent - Tenant failed to establish that he had paid rent w.e.f. 24.08.1998 to 12.11.2005 - He was granted one month's time by Rent Controller to make up deficiency in arrears of rent - Tenant failed to do so - Held, eviction proper - Petition dismissed...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Ejectment- Bona fide need - Death of landlord - Landlord sought ejectment of tenant on ground that he required demised premises to enable his son to run his business - During pendency ejectment petition landlord died - His son was impleaded as legal representative of landlord - Held, since..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(iii)-- Ejectment - Unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Landlord sought ejectment on ground that premises in question had been rendered unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Building expert deposed that flooring of building was not in a workable condition - Balas supporting roof had started decaying..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Personal necessity - Second eviction petition - Maintainability - Held, under Rent Act, ground of bona fide requirement or no, payment of rent is a recurring cause - Therefore, landlord is not precluded from instituting fresh proceeding - Genuineness of bona fide requirement is to be decided on..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Ejectment - Personal necessity - Landlord sought eviction of tenant on ground of personal necessity to expand his business - Some of the tenants had already vacated portion in their occupation - Landlord wanted to renovate entire building and run his business in same - Held, landlord is the best..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(i), Power of Attorney Act, 1882, Section 1A, 2-- Ejectment suit through power of attorney holder - Landlord permitted to examine himself as witness, although, his attorney had been examined - Held, no illegality in impugned order - Petitioner/tenant will get an opportunity to cross-examine him - Petition dismissed...........

Showing : 31-40 of 772 Results