Showing : 1391-1400 of 4901 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 401-- Dishonour of Cheque - Conviction - Validity - Cheque issued by petitioner to opposite party for discharging liability was returned by Bank with remarks "stop payment" - Contention of petitioner that she is neither concerned with any business of her husband nor has accepted any amount from opposite..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Prosecution of directors - Quashing of proceedings - Except the averments, that directors were i, charge and responsible to company nothing has been stated as to what part was played by directors petitioners and how they were responsible regarding..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Conviction and sentence - Three cheques issued by petitioner/accused to re-pay borrowed amount were returned unpaid with endorsement `account closed' - During pendency of revision petition, petitioner/accused paid a sum of Rs.4,94,000/- by way of demand draft in favour of..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of proceedings - Complaint filed against petitioner with mala fide intention and oblique motive to unnecessarily harass him - Complainant failed to appear in the case in spite of service of notice upon him twice - Held, entire proceedings liable to be quashed -..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Conviction - Validity - Amount involved in dishonoured cheque was Rs.9,00,000/- - Trial Court imposed a fine of Rs.100/- on first accused and directed second accused to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to complainant - Held, since complainant has established his case against..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Propriety - Allegation that cheque issued by accused/respondent towards repayment of loan dishonoured - Failure of complainant/appellant to produce income tax returns containing loan transaction - Held, as per settled position of law, when income tax assessee..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, 420- - Dishonour of cheques - Cheating - Ingredients necessarily be there for constituting offence of cheating - Held, (1) there should be fraudulent or dishonest inducement of a person by deceiving him - (2) (a) person so deceived should be induced to deliver any property to any persons, or to consent..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, 420, 482- - Dishonour of cheques - Cheating & criminal breach of trust - Quashing of - First element of deception constituting an offence of cheating is lacking as nowhere allegations made in complaint do indicate about complainant being deceived by petitioner in any manner - None of ingredients required to..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 420, 120B, 482- - Dishonour of cheque - Cheating & criminal breach of trust - Quashing of entire criminal proceedings - None of ingredients required to constitute offence u/s.405 of IPC attracted even if entire allegations are accepted to be true - Necessary pleadings with respect to submission, that statutory..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138- - Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Delay of 10 days - Condonation of - Notice received by accused on 05.04.2005 - Complaint filed on 30.05.2005 i.e. after expiry of prescribed period - Though no petition filed u/s 473 of Cr.P.C., Magistrate took cognizance after expiry of period of limitation,..........

Showing : 1391-1400 of 4901 Results