Showing : 411-420 of 4908 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 147-- Dishonour of cheque - Compounding of offence - Dispute amicably settled by parties - Complainant not interested in prosecuting accused and thus, permitted to compound the offence - Conviction and sentence passed against accused set aside, subject to deposit of 15% of cheque amount with Uttarakhand..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Dismissed of complaint in default - Complainant diligently pursuing his remedies and he also have given an explanation for his no, appearance on the date fixed due to wrong noting down of date - Even otherwise there is no reason as to why complainant would stop pursuing his..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Cross examination - One is required to put one's own version in cross-examination of opponent - Effect of non cross-examination is that the statement of witness has not been disputed...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Cross-examination - Legally inadmissible evidence is not rendered admissible merely because no cross-examination thereon has taken place...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint dismissed for default - As per evidence on record, it shows that in no way by absence, complainant is to be benefited in this complaint nor there is anything on record to show that there was any malafide intention on part of complainant for his absence from..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - No document to show any loan transaction - Complainant also not proved his capacity to give such a big loan - Even if complainant had collected the money from his grandmother and relatives, then why he has given such a huge amount to accused without obtaining any security..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(4)-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Rebuttal - No document to prove loan transaction - Evidence on record shows probable version given by accused is correct - Complainant failed to prove his case against accused beyond shadow of reasonable doubt - Accused rightly acquitted...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Petitioner not signatory to cheque - However, in case if he has any role to play in issuance of cheque in question, then said question is to be determined during course of proceedings in complaint - Petition disposed of accordingly...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(4)-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Admittedly, complainant has no friendly relationship with accused, hence, there is doubt that why complainant will give such a huge amount without getting executed any security document - Even, there is nothing on record to show any particulars of loan -..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - S.138 of the Act only requires sending of `notice in writing' - It does not say that it should necessarily be sent by registered post A.D. - Sending of telegrams after dishonour of cheques demanding payments, is sufficient compliance of requirement of law that..........

Showing : 411-420 of 4908 Results