Showing : 1331-1340 of 4908 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142(b), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 204-- Dishonour of cheque - Summoning of accused - Validity - Complaint filed on 06.02.1995 after serving demand notice on 14.01.1995 - Cause of action to institute complaint arose when no payment was made within 15 days from date of service - Thus, right to lodge complaint accrued only on expiry of 15..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142(b), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 204-- Dishonour of cheque - Summoning of accused - Validity - Contention that in absence of original of dishonoured cheque Court could not have issued process - Held, at the stage of issuance of process Court is required to see whether a prima facie case is made out or not - Question of admissibility..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Some mistake in case records represented before Magistrate by appellant/complainant - Instead of taking any earnest and speedy steps to correct mistake occurred in present case complainant and his counsel protracted proceedings in another case by..........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Quashing of - Respondent who was alive to the fact that notice would take some time to reach petitioner did not file complaint immediately after notice was posted - Respondent instead waited for four more days and filed complaint on 19th day after notice was..........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Quashing of - Cheque was presented and dishonoured at Srinagar - It is no body's case that cheque was drawn at Pulwama - Held, merely because notice was dispatched from Pulwama to petitioner at his Srinagar address would not give jurisdiction to Court at Pulwama -..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Evidence of complainant is inconsistent with regard to date on which amount was lent to accused - Admittedly, accused was working as a teacher as on that date and if really she had issued a cheque, she would have written blanks left in said cheque with..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Statutory notice - Petitioner/accused issued a legal notice to complainant and her husband in another matter - Respondent/complainant along with her husband sent a suitable reply through their counsel disputing correctness of said notice and also specifically mentioned that..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Statutory notice to advocate of accused - Validity - Held, reply notice issued by complainant to advocate for accused can be termed as statutory notice provided it fulfill statutory obligation provided u/s.138 of the NI Act and copy of notice has to be sent to accused..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by Company - Vicarious liability - Petitioners as Chairman and Directors of Company were informed of their role while transacting with respondent/complainant - Petitioners have categorical role in transaction - Petitioner No.1 indeed was representing company in..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque- Complaint - Affidavit filed by complainant in support thereof - Held, Magistrate can rely upon verification in the form of affidavit - He need not call upon complainant to remain present in Court nor to examine him or his witnesses on oath before taking decision to issue..........

Showing : 1331-1340 of 4908 Results