Showing : 51-60 of 142 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Provision of S.14 of the Act is not applicable when plaintiff was defending the suit brought against him - Held, merely defending a suit is not and cannot amount to prosecution of a suit...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Delay in filing suit - Exclusion of time - Applicability of S.14 - Held, S.14 of the Act would be applicable only when plaintiff was prosecuting other proceedings against defendant relating to same matter in issue before other Court which did not have jurisdiction...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 692 days in filing revision - There is no explanation at all, as to after withdrawal of the writ petition on 29.9.2010, what prevented the petitioner for not filing the present revision petition till 3.2.2011 - There is no..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 692 days in filing revision - There is no explanation at all, as to after withdrawal of the writ petition on 29.9.2010, what prevented the petitioner for not filing the present revision petition till 3.2.2011 - There is no..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Limitation - Exemption from - Held, relief u/s 14 should be claimed in a subsequent suit after the first "civil proceeding" is turned down defective...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Limitation - Exemption from - Writ jurisdiction - Held, High Court can not grant exemption from limitation u/s 14 while dismissing a writ petition as not the appropriate remedy...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Exemption from limitation - Plaintiff should plead and prove : (a) The exemption claimed should be for the period the plaintiff has been prosecuting a civil proceeding in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision against the defendant; (b) such proceedings prosecuted should have been done..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Summary Jurisdiction - Banking service - Fixed deposits - Fraud and forgery - Serious allegations relating to fraud, forgery and connivance of bank have been leveled on the part of the bank with regard to FDR's - In the present case proper course for the appellant is to approach the civil Court in..........
ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1) (d), Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 9-- Telegram - Non reaching the destination - Limitation - Complaint filed after 30 days from the date of booking which is beyond the period as prescribed by the rules made under the Indian Telegraph Act - Impugned order passed by the District Forum holding the appellant deficient in service liable to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, 5-- Pursuing remedy in wrong forum inspite of it being brought to the notice of a party - Held, there was lack of diligence on the part of appellant throughout and thus they are not entitled to the benefit of either S.5 or S.14 of Limitation Act - Time spent in pursuing appeal before wrong forum..........

Showing : 51-60 of 142 Results