Showing : 51-60 of 138 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Limitation - Exemption from - Held, relief u/s 14 should be claimed in a subsequent suit after the first "civil proceeding" is turned down defective...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Limitation - Exemption from - Writ jurisdiction - Held, High Court can not grant exemption from limitation u/s 14 while dismissing a writ petition as not the appropriate remedy...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Exemption from limitation - Plaintiff should plead and prove : (a) The exemption claimed should be for the period the plaintiff has been prosecuting a civil proceeding in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision against the defendant; (b) such proceedings prosecuted should have been done..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Summary Jurisdiction - Banking service - Fixed deposits - Fraud and forgery - Serious allegations relating to fraud, forgery and connivance of bank have been leveled on the part of the bank with regard to FDR's - In the present case proper course for the appellant is to approach the civil Court in..........
ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1) (d), Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 9-- Telegram - Non reaching the destination - Limitation - Complaint filed after 30 days from the date of booking which is beyond the period as prescribed by the rules made under the Indian Telegraph Act - Impugned order passed by the District Forum holding the appellant deficient in service liable to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, 5-- Pursuing remedy in wrong forum inspite of it being brought to the notice of a party - Held, there was lack of diligence on the part of appellant throughout and thus they are not entitled to the benefit of either S.5 or S.14 of Limitation Act - Time spent in pursuing appeal before wrong forum..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, 14-- Condonation - Filing of an application for condonation under a wrong provision of law does not vitiate the application...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Arbitration award - Setting aside - S.14 Limitation Act is applicable to application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act - In computing the limitation period of three months the time during which the applicant was prosecuting the matter bonafide and with due diligence before the wrong Court has to be..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Prosecuting the remedy in wrong forum - Extension of limitation - Benefit of provision is available only when it is proved that mistake was bona fide - When a party pursues case in a wrong forum in a negligent manner and without good faith and due diligence then such party is not entitled to the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A, 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Limitation - Insurance claim - Plea that in terms of clause 12 of the Insurance Policy the complaint not filed within 12 calendar months from the date of repudiation i.e. by letter dated 16.6.1989 hence barred by limitation repelled - Held that the limitation of 12 calendar months for filing the..........

Showing : 51-60 of 138 Results