Showing : 71-80 of 134 Results

UTTARANCHAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Ground for condonation of delay that there is always delay in the official machinery - Held that such a ground has never been recognised as a ground for condonation of delay...........
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Mere interdepartmental consultation leading to delay in filing the appeal does not constitute `sufficient cause' for the condonation of delay in terms of the provision of Section 15 of the Act...........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UTTARAKHAND
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Limitation - Held that limitation shall run from the date of issue of copy and not from the date of actual judgment...........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UTTARAKHAND
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - When the appeal is admitted, the delay, if any, stands condoned...........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Relief - Appellant aggrieved by orders of District Forum for non grant of all reliefs sought - Appellant/complainant making statement before the District Forum confining his complaint only to averments of inordinate delay in releasing the telephone connection - Held that the complaint..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, Penal Code, 1860, Section 193, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340,195-- Only averment made by the complainant/appellant before the District Forum was that affidavits of the officials of the OP being contrary to the factual position on record - No application moved by complainant seeking initiation of the inquiry under Section 340(1) Cr.P.C. - Even otherwise there is..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 126 days in filing appeal - Appellants averment that its counsel did not file appeal despite repeated visits by its local representative - In case the local representative came to know the inaction on the part of the counsel then he could take up the matter..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, ANDHRA PRADESH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 100 days in filing appeal - Ground that file was misplaced - The explanation held not convincing as details are all deliberately left vague - Delay cannot be condoned...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 157 days in filing the appeal - Plea taken that delay occurred due to illness of Senior Vice President (Legal) of the Appellant-Company - Illness of one person in a Public Company cannot be sufficient cause for condoning the delay - Appeal dismissed as..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of Delay - Delay of 1 month and 28 days in filing the appeal - No details given as to how much time and in what manner that time was spent by the applicant to get the approval of the concerned authorities for filing the appeal - No sufficient ground to condone the delay -..........

Showing : 71-80 of 134 Results