Showing : 531-540 of 1566 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15-- Recovery of poppy husk - Search conducted in fair manner - Case property as well as samples were properly sealed - Case property produced before Magistrate without any delay and free from any tampering - Case property deposited in malkhana in safe condition - No link evidence missing -..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Section 15-- Conscious possession - Recovery of 60 bags of poppy husk from canter - Conviction - Sustainability - Appellant apprehended at the spot whereas other co-accused managed to run away - Appellant was driving canter in question on day of recovery - Appellant pleaded that he was ignorant of fact that..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Section 15-- Recovery of 60 bags of poppy husk from canter - Presence of appellant at the spot doubtful - Appellant suffering from diabetes mellitus and fracture on his right leg and plastered for three weeks - Even in Court, appellant appeared on wheel chair as is evident from cross examination of PW6 - Not..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Section 15-- Recovery of 60 bags of poppy husk from canter - Appellant owner of canter in question - Presence of appellant at the spot doubtful - DW4 concluded in his inquiry that appellant is innocent as he was present with his father for getting him treated qua fracture suffered by him o the day of recovery..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Section 15-- Recovery of 60 bags of poppy husk from canter - Presence of appellant at the spot doubtful - Appellant only described as Chacha in ruqa - Appellant not apprehended at the spot although police party consisted of six police officials - Possibility that appellant might have been falsely involved in..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Validity - Contention that respondent No.3 has been illegally attesting documents as lambardar - Respondent No.3 has justified it on ground that he was doing so under impression that he was appointed by Collector which has been affirmed by FC - No complaint has been..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Easements Act, 1882, Section 15-- Easement by necessity - Right to use cart track given by way of grant in partition deed - Cart track passed through lands of defendants and used by plaintiffs to reach to their property - Use of cart track admitted by defendants - Usage of such cart track was more than 20 years - Therefore, there..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Stay - Validity - Single Judge totally ignored the fact that even before his appointment as Lambardar, appellant was working as Sarbrah Lambardar - After his appointment as Lambardar by Collector, not only sanad of Lambardari was issued, but he had also started..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Notaries Public Act, 1952, Section 15, Notaries Public Rules, 1956, Rule 4, 7, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226-- Appointment as Notary - Name of appellant figured in list of recommenced candidates but later decision was taken not to appoint him - Appellant made application directly to Chief Minister of State - Note issued by C.M. on his application recommending his appointment - Cannot be treated as a..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Notaries Public Act, 1952, Section 15, Notaries Public Rules, 1956, Rule 4, 7-- Appointment as Notary - Empanelment - Appointment refused on ground that application was filed after cut-off date - Such candidate cannot claim appointment against vacancy which arose from quashing of appointment of another candidate as his application was received much after cut-off date fixed in..........

Showing : 531-540 of 1566 Results