Showing : 601-610 of 1566 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Confession by co-accused - Can be used against him as well as other co-accused even if they are acquitted for offence under the TADA Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Confession - Made u/s 15 of the Act is admissible in the trial of a co-accused for offence committed and tried in the same case together with the accused who makes the confession...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 12, 15-- Statute - Interpretation - Jurisdiction to interpret a statute can be invoked only when language is ambiguous - Languages of Ss.12 & 15 being clear and unambiguous there is no need to interpret the same differently...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Confession - Merely because similarity of confessional statements of both the accused, it cannot be said that they are neither normal nor unnatural - Such similarity does not vitiate the probative value of such confessional statement...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Confession - Made u/s 15 of the Act is admissible in the trial of a co-accused for offence committed and tried in the same case together with the accused who makes the confession...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Confession - A confessional statement given u/s 15 shall not be discarded merely for the reason that the same has been retracted...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Confession - Merely because similarity of confessional statements of both the accused, it cannot be said that they are neither normal nor unnatural - Such similarity does not vitiate the probative value of such confessional statement...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Provisions of Evidence Act and Cr.P.C. are not applicable to cases tried under the Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Confession - A confessional statement given u/s 15 shall not be discarded merely for the reason that the same has been retracted...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Provisions of Evidence Act and Cr.P.C. are not applicable to cases tried under the Act...........

Showing : 601-610 of 1566 Results