Showing : 161-170 of 384 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3)-- For proceedings u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C., complaint must disclose relevant material ingredients of the alleged offence - If there is a flavour of civil nature, the same cannot be agitated in the form of criminal proceeding - If there is huge delay and then in order to avoid the period of limitation, it..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 203, 200, 156(3)-- Application u/s 156(3) treated as complaint - Dismissal of complaint by holding that no offence is made out - Even if the civil suit are pending between the parties, if any offence has been committed then it is the duty of the Court to take cognizance of the offence - Complaint can be dismissed..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3)-- In a civil suit decree passed on the basis of compromise whereby sale deed was to be executed within 15 days failing which petitioner was entitled to get the decree executed through Court - Accused sold the property to third party and thus alleged to have committed fraud - Held, in pursuance of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3)-- Application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. - Rejected - Vehicle driven rashly and negligently hit the motorcycle of the complainant from behind causing accident and injuries - Author of crime not known - In such cases police investigation was a must - No option except to direct registration of FIR -..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3),200-- Complaint - Cognizance - Taking of - Held, where a jurisdiction is exercised on a complaint petition filed in terms of S.156(3) or S.200 of CrPC, Magistrate is required to apply his mind - Penal Code does not contain any provision for attaching vicarious liability on part of Managing Director or..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3), 203-- Application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. - Magistrate can treat it as a complaint case and record evidence u/ss 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. - Prayer that Magistrate should treat application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. as State case rejected - Revision dismissed...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3), 200, 202-- Cognizance of complaint once taken then investigation by police u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. cannot be ordered - However, Magistrate after recording evidence of complainant and witnesses during inquiry can direct further inquiry u/s 202 Cr.P.C...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3), 202-- Police investigation - Magistrate can order police investigation both u/s 156(3) and u/s 202 Cr.P.C. - The only difference is the stage at which such power can be invoked - Power u/s 156(3) can be exercised at the pre-cognizance stage while power u/s 202 is at the post-cognizance stage...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3)-- Application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. - Magistrate has power to treat the application as complaint...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3)-- An order made under S.156(3) Cr.P.C. is in the nature of a preemptory reminder or intimation to the police to exercise its plenary power of investigation under S.156(1) Cr.P.C...........

Showing : 161-170 of 384 Results