LawMirror.com

Results of s 302 ipc 3

Showing : 151-160 of 226 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Motive - Held, it is not necessary for prosecution to prove motive always to secure conviction - But sometimes in order to appreciate prosecution case motive becomes relevant...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Accused alleged to have killed his uncle and aunt by firing gun shots - Prior to incident there was a joint family and deceased were living amicably with accused - Prosecution failed to show that in past or immediately prior to incident some altercation took place..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 304(Part II), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, 32 -- Murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Proof - Appellant without any premeditation set fire on clothes of prosecutrix after dousing her with kerosene - Incident admittedly took place when prosecutrix resisted appellant to commit rape - In FIR, a dying declaration, it was..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 3 -- Explosions and firing - Gruesome carnage resulting in death of 35 persons - Name of appellant No.2 not given in FIR - Injured witness deposing that appellant No.2 was slitting throats of deceased - However, said witness was unable to identify appellant - No other..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 3 -- Explosions and firing - Gruesome carnage resulting in death of 35 persons - Appellants No.3 and 1 named in FIR - Injured witness deposed that both appellants were slitting throats of deceased - Both appellants were identified by eye witnesses in Court as..........

TRIPURA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Accused alleged to have caused death of brother of informant by lathi blows - So, i, law of informant had not disclosed to anybody else except before trial Court that he had seen deceased with accused for last time before discovery of dead body - It could not be ruled..........

TRIPURA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - Held, in case of circumstantial evidence, when theory of last seen together is one of the circumstances to link accused with offence and prove his guilt but said fact, if disclosed for first time in Court, should not be accepted as always last seen..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Arms Act, 1959, Section 3, 25 -- Murder - Accused pleaded that pellets were not found by doctor in chest of deceased during post-mortem - Medico legal evidence shows that bullet pierced across the chest and oval shape of wound was found - Specific allegations of firing gun shot corroborated with medical evidence - Minor contradictions..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Murder - Destruction of evidence - Proof - Material witnesses did not support theory of last seen together - Missing report of deceased lodged day after recovery of dead body - No explanation given for delay in reporting the matter - Non-examination of independent witnesses, tendering of..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Murder - Conviction - Validity - No eye-witness to incident - Nothing on record to show that accused had inflicted knife blows upon deceased - Even complainant in his examination-in-chief categorically stated that how deceased suffered injuries was not known to him - Held, accused entitled to benefit of..........

Showing : 151-160 of 226 Results